When we at Twenty Nine Inches found out we were going to be testing the 2011 XXIX from Raleigh, we also found out we were going to be testing two of them. One went to Grannygear out in SoCal and one to me here in the Mid-West. After the “Out Of The Box” post, we split up the Mid-term reports. Grannygear’s can be read here and mine here.
Grannygear’s Final Thoughts: Well, since the mid-term on the Raleigh XXIX, nothing has really changed my impressions overall. The XXIX remains what it is – a stable, smooth riding (except for the stock, steel fork), capable and simple single speed bike that is unique in that it uses the Gates Carbon Drive rather than a chain. Nothing has failed on it, although, especially in stock form, there is little to go wrong as long as the belt drive is not a problem (and that has been solid overall). The split shell eccentric bottom bracket (EBB) has been quiet and has not slipped. The wheels, cranks and house brand Avenir parts have been solid enough for the duration of the test.
I let a couple of bigger, younger guys ride it to see what they thought. None of them had any real single speed experience. The first rider, a college age, 190lb racer type, went out on the XXIX and set a new record for a local loop he often rides. The next ‘guest rider’ was an over 200lb, very strong 29″er rider who usually rides an XL, V1, Turner Sultan. He liked it enough to buy a used, two year old XXIX from a mutual friend. He had one instance of what may have been a tooth jump by the belt, but could have been a free hub pawl looking for a home. He was not sure, but I rode with him on a very demanding 20 mile loop that had some very steep climbs and he had no issues with the belt on that ride. That, in my opinion, was a good sign.
Here are some thoughts that Tony had after some time on the XXIX:
“* I really liked this bike for two reasons: 1. The SS mentality of less is more and 2. The actual bike ride enjoyment itself. With respect to the first one ,and since this is my first SS chariot, I’m sold on the life. There is a lot to argue for given the simplicity that this belt drive SS affords. No chain lube, no derailleur adjustment, just clip in and go.
* With that being said, on to my specific thoughts on the Raleigh XXIX. I had always heard, and usually by those that had been doing this for a while, a certain fondness for steel framed bikes. I thought maybe it had something to do with remembering their childhood, things just aren’t as durable as they used to be, yadayadayada…but I get it now. It really does ride completely different when compared to the newer high efficiency lower weight aluminum’s/carbons/scandium’s. It actually flexes and it does it subtly in just the right areas.
* The first negative is me needing to learn to spin fast without looking like a Mexican jumping bean on the saddle! The second negative is the obvious increased weight of the steel frame. Although this was lighter than my FS, it was not as light as many other HT SS’s and thus warrants a minor deduction. The last of the negatives would be the belt drive…this made me fairly nervous riding solo as I didn’t want to venture too far from home base for fear I would snap this foreign device and be left with a long walk home. The obvious solution is carry an additional belt along with any tools needed to tighten the belt in the field.
* Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed riding this bike and ended up agreeing to buy a friend’s older version of an XXIX (for a great price I might add!). I think it is the perfect bike for me to continue training on and certainly offers its own personality and characteristics unique to anything I have ridden in the past.”
Kevin, another young and very fit guy rode the XXIX next. He is a new rider, just getting into his second season on mountain bikes. At 6’3” and around 200 lbs of solid muscle, he loved the XXIX, having a blast on what was his first SS and his first 29er too. On one ride, he was asking me where he could buy one. In fact, he even raced as part of a 12-hour, 5 man team effort on it when his FS 26er frame cracked after less than a year of use. However, I would point out the obvious…he had never ridden another SS OR 29er, so he had little to compare it too. But, the other point to that is that the XXIX is good enough to impress even young and strong riders.
So what do I think? Well, the XXIX is well placed to provide a ticket to ride a Gates Carbon Drive bike with little cash outlay. I will discuss my thoughts on the belt drive separate from the XXIX as a whole, so that is all I will say for now about the belt part of it. How is it as a bicycle and, more importantly, how is it as a single speed trail bike?
I think that it would make a fine bike is you are on a budget, do not need gears or a suspension fork, and do not make performance a very high priority, like racing, instant response, etc. If the Gates belt is a plus to ya, then add that in as a big factor. As a pure single speed…well, there it falls a bit short as far as I am concerned. I am put off by the long chain stays. They require you to be very good with weight shifts in order to keep the rear tire hooked up and driving and the overall feel when you are fighting to re-gain momentum can be described as lazy. With the lower front end and increased offset of the Rock Shox Recon TK Gold, it turns pretty well but never will be looked to as a dense woods/tight trail performer.
So what is it good for? Well, let us say you want one bike that needs to be simple and will be multi purpose. Perhaps it is your commuter, townie, errand, trail/dirt-road bike and the clean running belt is a plus along with simple parts like mechanical brakes and a solid fork. The steel frame will ride well and should last. The long wheelbase matters little and would be good with panniers or a rack. Weight is not a concern for you.
Or perhaps your interest in the single speed is just as a cruiser; a fun, different strokes thing that gets you away from your full suspension or racy hard tail bikes. You like long rides and appreciate stability and a relaxed feel overall and would likely not be lining up to race any time soon, although you do have that 75 mile endurance ride in mind this spring. You keep it stock except for a lighter set of tires and mount up the fattest front rubber you can find to offset the rigid fork. Maybe you will add some better tubeless wheels next year or even a used suspension fork for that longer ride.
Make sense? I once heard someone say that a weed is just a plant out of place. That said, keeping the XXIX in the right perspective reveals a unique bike that just may be what you want to pedal. It is a bold step for Raleigh in spec’ing the Gates Carbon Drive and time will tell how it is received.
Guitar Ted’s Thoughts:
My time on the Gates Belt driven XXIX was one of constant component refinement. So, from my view, the XXIX as it comes out of the box isn’t quite my cup-o-tea. First off, the fidgeting with the “belt line”, (which should be a running change fix and newer versions shouldn’t have this issue), the ultra-rigid fork, and the tires all either required adjustment, or replacement to really bring out the best in the bike. As I say, the belt issue should be getting taken care of, and tires, well those are always a personal preference item. Although at around a 1000 grams each, I wouldn’t know of too many folks that would prefer the stock shoes on the XXIX! However; that fork. Oh my! I do like my rigid forks, but Raleigh simply overbuilt this unit to the point of no give, and I can not bear to ride it. On went the Manitou Tower Expert, and all was much, much better.
As for other specifics, I concur with Grannygear on things like the long chain stays, (didn’t like them), and that makes it hard to like this as a single speed mountain bike. (Where climbing steeps is concerned.) I also felt that the handling package, as delivered, was lazy feeling, and did not inspire me. The change to the Manitou Tower Expert livened up the handling with its greater offset to the point that I began to like the XXIX a lot more.
The belt drive? Well, there was one major niggling issue that was discovered near the end of the test. It had to do with the rear belt cog. I was going to swap out the stock 10mm width belt for the Gates supplied 12mm belt. This gave me the chance to investigate the belt cog on the rear wheel. I was also curious about that free hub body that was getting progressively noisier. What I discovered was disappointing.
The cog wouldn’t come off. I had to use a chain whip and a dead blow hammer to loosen it up to the point I could pull it off, and what you see above is the result. The steel free hub body had notched the base of the Gates cog causing it to stick on the free hub body. I was concerned since I hadn’t had the bike all that long, and this damage is not something I could ignore. Another thing to note is that due to the cog’s unique offset, it can not simply be reversed. Bummer. I would need to get a new cog to take care of the problem correctly. (Editor’s Note: Grannygear also reported this same issue with the cog base after checking into it upon hearing of my issues.)
Other than this, as Grannygear indicates, we’ll look very closely at the Gates Belt and its ramifications on design in an upcoming post, so stay tuned for our thoughts on that facet of the XXIX.
My conclusions are that this is a great way to dive into a Gates Belt drive set up at a reasonable price, and that would even be more attractive if you have some spare tires and a suspension fork to throw at it. However; the stock rigid fork is just all wrong on the bike. Too rigid with too little offset. As a pure, single speed climbing machine, it falls very short. The apparent short life span of the spline interface of the Gates cog is a concern, as well. I would stick with something like Grannygear alludes to in his thoughts on the bike: A spare machine just to kick back and have fun on, or to use as your commuter, or possibly a single speed touring rig. Is the XXIX a “weed”, or a “plant out of place”? I can see where it could be something great in the right place, but there are a few things about it out of the box that need “weeding out” to get it there.
Twenty Nine Inches received these bikes for testing and review at no charge. We are not being paid, nor bribed for this review. We will give our honest thoughts throughout.
Would an old used three year old frame have the split dropouts for the belt? Anybody ridden the Trek commuter belt drive? My LBS said they sold over 15 of them the past 2 years, no problems. Combine that with a Sawyer and now you have something!
@yogi: Only the 2011 has a split drop out.
I was expecting a lot more comments but I guess the review speaks for itself. Well done guys.
can you guys talk a bit about manufacturer product testing process? how in the world does this bike get to the showroom before it’s ready for primetime? why does a huge company like Raleigh need you guys to beta test their bikes? the belt issue shouldn’t need a running change, they should have ironed that out before release. it would be different if you had discovered the problems are months of riding, but you saw alignment issues right away. that seems like someone not doing their job.
@jkd: I think it might be wise to consider that Raleigh’s goal here was to bring Belt Drive to a lower price point. They believe in the idea of belts and Gates is also wanting folks to get on board with it. Now that said, we do not know that Raleigh hadn’t signed off on a proper design, and then that the factory fudged the end product a bit for whatever reasons.
Basically, most of the cycling industry is “outsourced” based and due to that, minor glitches in communications or quality control are quite commonplace. (Just ask anyone that has assembled bike shop bikes. They know. ;)) Was this the source of Raleigh’s XXIX alignment issue? I can not answer that definitively, but it is highly possible. Especially when you consider the ultra-tight tolerances the Gates system must adhere to to function in the field.
Now add in the ultra-tight time schedule for model year introductions and it becomes nearly impossible for any manufacturer to deliver 100% flawless product to bicycle showroom floors. The communication, geographical, and technical issues that must be overcome to get new, shiny toys for all of us to play with are staggering. To have to make a running change is unfortunate for Raleigh, but it isn’t uncommon in the industry, and in fact, it is surprising it doesn’t happen more often given the challenges at hand for this industry to operate.
In the past 3 years i have had 3 of Raleigh’s xxix single speed 29ers. I have been an extremely satisfied customer for the first 2. So much so that when i saw that in 2011 Raleigh came out with the bike i love with a belt drive, i was very interested. After doing a bit of research i decided that the bike looked solid and i pulled the trigger. I work at a bike shop and couldn’t wait to get it in and get it all tuned up. I built it up and took it for a ride that day. I immediately started having problems. I am a 22yr old 6’2′ 200 lb rider and i was slipping the belt on almost every climb and was flexing the rear triangle so much that the belt was wanting to ride off. I tuned and retuned the bike several times and tried riding the bike and had nothing but problems. The rear end, because of the lengthened chain stays (to compensate for the large belt ring) and separation in the frame, is extremely flexy and causes the belt system to be very temperamental. I contacted Raleigh and they sent me to gates. Gates informed me that the belt had to be under very high tension. I did so to spec from gates and the very next ride the belt snapped. I contacted them yet again and they over nighted a belt to me with no hesitation. I got the new belt and got it tensioned correctly and ran it. After only 3 months of riding the free hub body went out due to the high tension that the belt requires. I had to contact Raleigh to get a new one. After 3 more months of riding my free hub body (that i have already had to change) is starting to make noise again. I had a race this weekend and did not want to deal with the belt system so i bought a 3/32 chain cog and chain ring to race. During the race ( 18 miles) i derailed the chain 3 times. I have had nothing but problems with the 2011 Raleigh xxix belt drive bike.
Like i said, i am the proud owner of two 2009 Raleigh xxix’s and have nothing but good things to say about them. The rear triangle is forgiving but laterally stiff. It is also 3 chain links shorter than the 2011 which makes it handle much better. I am not just bashing Raleigh just to but i have had nothing but problems with the 2011. I am a hard rider but definitely not abusive to my drive train by any means. I have put the 2009s through hell and back and have had no problems what so ever. I have read many reviews on of people running the belt system on other bikes and have had no problems. I think that Raleigh has 2 major design flaws in there frame. Chain stays are to long which causes flex and the way that the belt is worked through the frame. Other companies have found better ways to get the belt through the frame without causing so much flex in the frame. I have run a chain and i have run a belt. They both slip and jump so i am lead to believe that it is not my drive chain but the frame itself.
What do you guys think of the wheel and tire combo, weinman/geax, that comes with the bike? How is the stiffness and grip when railing turns, etc?
Thanks
Kevin
@Kevin: The wheels were fine. Decent, maybe a tad heavy, and rolled very well. The tires, (OE Saguaros), were really heavy. You can save significant amounts of weight with a swap to Saguaro folders. That said, the stock tires gripped quite well for what they are. My recommendation would be to stick with the stock wheels but to get new tires as fast as possible.