With this post, we conclude our coverage of Interbike 2011. First off- We thank you for reading. We also hope you enjoyed it. Without you, the readers, Twenty Nine Inches doesn’t exist.
Okay, with that out of the way, and all of our information gathered put out for consumption, what was it that made an impression during the time we were at Interbike? Here are our highlights and some final commentary.
Rain: After doing several blast furnace-like demo days in years past, the overcast, wet, and cooler temps were a welcomed thing, as far as I was concerned. Apparently riders didn’t agree, since this was a sparsely attended Outdoor Demo Days. Too bad, because on Tuesday, the trails probably had the best traction I’d ever experienced there. Riding the demo bikes was more fun than ever.
The rain continued on the first day of the Indoor Show, and we saw some creek-sized runs of water flowing swiftly through our hotel parking area. Obviously, it rains every so often in Las Vegas, but I’d never seen that while attending an Interbike before.
Running around in a city you are not super familiar with makes you look for certain landmarks where you know you can rely on good things and good times. Generally stories of debauchery and drunkenness are what you might expect from Sin City, but I’m here to tell ya, they have one of the best bakeries I’ve ever been to in that town! 🙂 For Grannygear and I, seeking out this place is a must on our visits here. (By the way, we didn’t eat these. We gave them away at the Demo to some special friends.)
Fat Bikes: Besides the slug of 29″ers at Interbike, I think it is safe to say that the most ridden bikes quite possibly were the fat bikes brought by Surly and Salsa Cycles. We couldn’t get close to a Moonlander, and it wasn’t uncommon to walk by Surly’s tent, or Salsa Cycles’ tent, and not see any fat bikes at all. They were constantly being demoed.
A lot of this ground swell of popularity for these rigs has to go to the Alaskan shop, Speedway Cycles, and the owner, Greg Matyas. (Shown at right) Greg and his crew have brought several innovations to fat biking that are being used now by other companies.
Greg has tirelessly championed the fat bike, and shows up at Sea Otter and Interbike every year without fail with a bike in tow. This year was no different, as he was seen as shown with his latest titanium Fatback brand rig, set up with S&S couplers, and his newest Uma rims, which we have heard can be set up tubeless. Pretty trick!
Suspension Evolves, Carbon Goes Viral:
I suppose the biggest impressions made on 29″ers in regards to Interbike has to be centered on the Yeti SB 95, Ibis Ripley, and all the carbon framed hard tails, carbon wheels, and carbon components that have proliferated to the point where it gets hard to keep track of all the carbon bits available for 29 inch bikes. Suspension innovation is now made simultaneously in 29 and 26 inch realms, a thing unheard of only a few years ago. One has to wonder when 26 inch XC/Trail full suspension will play “second fiddle” to new innovations in the future. At the rate of change in the market place, this thought may not be as absurd as it may sound right now.
In terms of carbon fiber hard tails, it is apparent that in the high end hard tail market, 26 inch bikes are way off the back. At the show, I only noticed a few outstanding examples. Most companies are limiting 26 inch innovations to bigger hit, long travel, or down hill rigs these days. Even shorter travel XC full suspension bikes are competing with an onslaught of new 29″er designs. XC/Trail is fast becoming the realm of 29″ers, at least by the looks of things at Interbike.
Furthermore to the point about carbon fiber; we are seeing just the tip of the iceberg, as it were, in regards to the use of carbon for 29 inch products. We heard whispers from several people about upcoming carbon full suspension big wheelers. Carbon is being liberally used in wheels, and more rigid forks in carbon seem to pop up every year. Get ready for more carbon, (and probably high prices as well).
Twenty Nine Inches has been attending Interbike since 2005, and this year it was quite apparent that the scales are tipping in favor of big wheeled bikes. We are amazed at the way things have gone in the past seven years of Interbike shows, and where it will end up is anybody’s guess, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see things continue to get bigger for 29″ers. How much bigger? Well, we’ve said this before, but some companies are considering dropping 26 inch hard tails from their XC/trail categories altogether. That in and of itself speaks volumes about where the industry is headed in terms of 29″ers.
Thanks again for checking in with our Interbike coverage. Next post- Back to your regular Twenty Nine Inch diet of news, reviews, and views! 🙂
You should check your tape measure.
There is no way this danish is 29 inches.
http://twentynineinches.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/DSCF8218.JPG
“Whispers about upcoming carbon full suspension big wheelers”?? Come on GT, out with it!!
The key word is you didn’t eat “these” danishes. Says nothing about the ones *not* pictured.
That Ti Fatback is awesome. I’d love one of those (when I can afford it)
One last thing: In respect to FS bikes, is there a breakdown of sorts as to what constitutes a XC, Trail or AM bike in terms of inches of travel, etc? I keep hearing all of the references to these categories, but I can’t make heads or tails out of the characteristics of each.
@dave
Just my opinion but the XC, trail, and AM categories seem pretty subjective, although marketing peeps might disagree with me. Now it seems that 100mm travel is “XC” all the way to 140mm travel which would be “AM” . . . . but my Tallboy is ‘XC” according to Santa Cruz and with a 120mm fork and a dropper post it is pretty darn good as a “trail” bike . . . there are so many other things that factor in though, like head angle. The SB95 is pretty slack, making it more “AM” but people seemed to have fun on the “trail” with it at Interbike . . .
@dave @Me: One of Grannygear’s favorite questions at Interbike for product and brand managers was “Is 120mm travel the new 100mm travel?” To which a lot of the guys would shrug and say, “I suppose so.” 🙂
XC bikes are almost all 100mm travel now. 80mm travel bikes seem off the back anymore. Efficiency in design has brought longer travel to faster riding categories, where power loss and weight are paramount. Look at Kulhavy, the World XC champ as an example there. (Full suspension even!)
So, categories are mixed up right now. That said, I think long travel is anything 120-plus. Trail bikes being on that line and up to 150mm. XC below that 120mm mark. AM/DH 29 stuff is rare in 29 inch wheels, so that hasn’t been established, but I think you would have to be looking at 150mm and longer there.
hey, it’s the most succinct ranking I’ve heard, so let’s turn it into an industry-wide (or twentynineinches.com) definition for the category. 🙂
One more: in the travels you list above, are you talking the same travel front and rear?
@dave: Dis-similar travel full suspension is going to proliferate. I would then look at geometry, length of the front fork, and other spec on the bike to give me hints. For instance, a bike may only have 110mm rear travel, but sport a 140mm front fork, with a sub 70 degree head angle and have 2.35″ knobby tires. Clearly not an XC bike. 😉
Thanks for indulging my FS curiosity. I’ve been a die-hard rigid SS rider to this point, but Camp Horizon in Kansas (come ride it sometime) got me thinking that it’s as good a time as any to bring myself out of the Stone Age. (well, halfway at least, as I’m digging the Lenz MilkMoney 4)
The suspension focus at IB 2011 is interesting, and I suppose inevitable as companies like Yeti get into to the segment harder on the 29-inch wheels.
As you might see with my questions, it can get somewhat bewildering with all the various suspension designs, travel lengths, geometry, etc. A few more variables than with a rigid, steel SS 29er. 😉
Looking at the graphics on the Yeti, I have to say that they did a good job of making it obvious which brand/model it is without making it look like a billboard. Hope they bring that scheme to market once released.
@ Me,
No answer from GT re the whispers but after seeing the paltry spec on RM Element 29 I would say tick there and I have it on good advice that the Yeti SB95 will have a carbon brother mid next year or later.
Can’t guess/think of any others just now..
@prof
Yes, I did happen to notice that GT avoided the issue 🙂 The carbon SB95 is definitely coming . . . But given the demand for the current offerings I am guessing 2013. But if I know GT, he has some other frames in mind . . . I am specifically interested in a new long travel Tallboy . . . GT- would you like to comment? Please?:)
Perhaps another Niner? It would be ideal for them to ride the wave of enthusiasm for their JetRDO with say a lightweight RIP?