Diamondback Mason: Out Of The Box- by Guitar Ted
Last week I introduced you all to the Diamondback Mason, one of a cadre of short chain stayed, slack angled, long travel hard tails that have started to appear on the scene for 29″er fans over the past couple of years. (Here is the link for that post.) Here I will detail the bike out for you and go over the intentions of this unusual hard tail design.
Design Intentions: While this is a departure from the standard issue hard tail 29″er, it isn’t a departure from “mountain biking” as it has always been defined. Diamondback strongly identifies the Mason as an “All Mountain” hard tail 29″er bike. Really- that’s what mountain bikes were back 25-30 years ago too. One bike did everything- It went up, it went down, and it went over trails everywhere. Now we have better geometry, bigger wheels, better components, and a new term for the bikes that “do it all”, which is All Mountain. Not a bike you’d go race the XC circuit on, and not the bike you’d go do the Red Bull Challenge on, but you know- those are extremes on either end of the mountain bike continuum, right? 🙂
Well, in steps the Mason, a 29″er hard tail design hatched by the minds at Diamondback to be the bike you go up, down, and over trails on anywhere. To that end it features some very different parameters than your typical XC/Trail oriented hard tail 29″ers out there. Let’s take a look at what separates the Diamondback Mason from the rest:
•Long Travel: The long, 140mm travel Fox Talas 29 CTD dominates the visual real estate up front. The Talas features 34mm stanchions, the new “Climb, Trail, Descend” compression settings, and a tapered steer tube with 15QR lowers. The Talas feature allows the rider of the Mason to drop the front end a bit for extended climbing and this reduces travel to 110mm.
•Geometry: That long fork looks “kicked out” and your eyes do not deceive you there. The Mason features a very All Mountain-like 66.5° head angle. (Unsagged- 140mm travel setting) The seat tube angle is a very climbing friendly 73°. Our 19” test sample, (other sizes are 15.5/Small, 17”/Medium, and 21”/XL), features a 24.4” effective top tube length, which is right about what you might expect for a size large 29”er hard tail. The bottom bracket height is at 13”/330mm, which fits the All Mountain character of this design well. But there is one more unusual trait to speak of yet….
•Short Chainstay Length: The Mason features a 433mm/17.04” chainstay length, which is pretty short for a 29”er. Diamondback achieves this short length by using a slightly offset seat tube to bottom bracket junction with a very noticeable forward bend in the seat tube. Diamondback still leaves clearance for a 2.3”er. (We’ll try fitting a couple of different combinations to see what the limits are here.)
•Components: The Mason is spec’ed with components you might expect to find on an AM build. The bike features Race Face components from its “Respond” model line including the bar, (740mm wide), the stem, (60mm), and crankset, (10spd compatible 32T ring, no bash guard) The Mason has a 1 X 10 set up with a MRP direct mount type chain guide up front and a SRAM Type 2 X-9 derailleur which both help keep the chain in place on the chain ring. (Note: There is also an ISCG tab on the frame for use with ISCG mounted chain guides/bash guards.Finally, a high direct mount front derailleur can be fitted, but Diamondback recommends going with a 2X set up and not a triple crank.)
•Frame Features/Wheels: The AM theme continues here with a tapered head tube, low slung, hydro-formed top tube, and 142 X 12mm through axle rear drop outs. The frame is made from Diamondback’s “Weapons Grade” aluminum in the 6061-T6 flavor. There are mounts for one water bottle on the down tube only. The wheels feature WTB’s Frequency i23 rims laced to Diamondback spec alloy 15mm through axle front and 12mm through axle rear hubs. Sealed cartridge bearings all around and the rear through axle is a SRAM Maxle.
•Dropper Post: The Mason features an infinitely adjustable KindShock “Drop Zone” dropper post with 125mm of range, a handle bar, cable actuated remote control, and is a 30.9mm diameter.
Other Highlights: The rest of the bike is kitted out with parts from SRAM including the 10 speed 11-36T cassette, Avid Elixir 5 brakes with a 200mm frt/180mm rear rotor set up, a Diamondback Signature saddle in an arresting red color, and the unusual combination of a Kenda Nevegal front tire and a Kenda Slant Six rear tire.
Notes: This Mason was culled from Diamondback’s demo fleet and shows the wear and tear of previous usage. Other than nicks and scratches, I’ve not noticed anything untoward that would affect the review here. Finally, I am using my own flat pedals on this bike. (Nothing to write home about either! 🙂 ) With these pedals, ready to ride, the Mason weighed in at 31.09lbs.
That about delineates what Diamondback thinks of as an “All Mountain” hard tail 29″er. We’ll see how it measures up in terms of capabilities and whether or not a short chain stayed, slack angled 29″er might make a good all arounder in my neck of the woods. I’ve already been bombing around on the Mason getting things dialed in. Stay tuned for a First Impressions post coming soon.
Note: Diamondback sent over the Mason for test/review at no charge to Twenty Nine Inches. We are not being bribed, nor paid for this review. We will strive to give or honest thoughts and opinions throughout
31 lbs for an aluminum framed 1×10. Sounds like it is better at going down hill than up! Sounds like it would be GREAT if it were 5 lbs lighter. Other than dropper post and fork where else could you lighten this thing up?
@Yogi: I had to pull off the Slant Six rear tire in the shop the other day, and thought to weigh the wire beaded version that comes stock on the bike: 800 gms right there. It also has tubes inside. 🙂
But that said, one has to be reminded that this is an AM bike build, not a XC/Trail bike. Many of those rigs weigh only 5-6lbs less than this bike does, but feature far less capable geometry and parts. In the grand scheme of things, when plying the wilds on an all day, back country mountain biking trip, you might want tough, reliable parts, not parts focused on weight savings. Or maybe that might not matter to some.
I suppose a few pounds could be found that were expendable here, but I would have to judge each weight cutting decision based on the intentions of the bike, and not purely upon just getting the lightest weight Mason.
DB has always had a bit of weight issues. Owning 2 DBs one being the 9er Overdrive Pro and yes both are a bit heavy. The Pro in a 20″ frame is about 30ish pounds stock. I feel one of the biggest areas that causes this weight issue is DB’s house wheelsets and tire combos. Invest a bit on some Stan’s and run tubeless and you can save a hefty bit of weight. Also DB builds bulletproof frames, they might weigh a bit extra but on an all-mountain rig like this, I would rather have a stout frame like theirs.
I will be buying one of these when they finally release First Q13.
GT on another note I saw a write up about someone fitting a 2.4″ Maxxis Ardent and still having good room. Does that stock rear tire need to be beef’d?
2 words…Yelli and Screamy. Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery and all that……
Though to be honest it is about 1/2 the price of a decent yelli build.
Mine canfield is <27lbs with a light but tough (and not bank breaking) build.Fox 34's would be nicer though.
Gibbon is pretty much spot on. My Yelli is just under 27 lbs and is the most fun bike ever! Head angle is slacker I think, but it is the same basic geo. More fun to more to more people!
You should ask for the Mason 29 FS when bike park season comes around. Big Bear with Gravity Logic are opening up at least 1 new feature. I also demo’d that, and discovered that it’s much more stable and eats bumps better than my 7″ 26″ FS bike, is very comfortable in the air, and its stiffness makes the turns feel straight forward. All you really need to do is to tell yourself to control your speed. 😀
I’ll be really interested to see what you think of this – and especially interested in how it might line up against some of the 120mm hardtails out there (Kona Honzo, etc). Not that you can totally answer that without testing those…
It is heavier than I realized. Especially as a lighter guy (under 160 fully loaded) bike weight does make a big difference to me. I got rid of a 31-lb FS 26er because I realized it was making my rides much less enjoyable. Not sure if a 31-lb 26er and 31-lb 29er should really be compared, but that’s what I have to go on…
Also, surprised this doesn’t come with a bash guard. Any ideas why not?
@Matt: Well, I will have a First Impressions post up soon, but as to the weight, I have a thought or two.
I think it could be lighter in some ways, but it also needs to be a tough, reliable mountain bike that can withstand aggressive moves and severe terrain. It is tricky to balance those two things and get a high performance All Mountain bike that won’t let you down.
There are compromises, certainly, being made here to hit a price point as well. I’m sure DB could have spec’ed lighter, strong components, but using that old K.B. saying- “Light, Cheap, Strong. Pick Two”. Which means that typically you have to make a sacrifice and DB chose a certain price point, which forces their hand here.
Apparently DB sacrificed some light weight parts here, and instead offered up a burly, durable steed. That’s what my feeling is so far.
This also may be why you don’t see a bash guard. 😉
So, I have pre ordered the mason (medium) and should get it early January and I can’t wait! I picked up a used Hamerschmit crankset and I have a fresh set of Stan’s arch rims with Hadley hubs and slant 6 2.2 tires. I figure the bike will weight in at 31 pounds (the same as my Rip 9)
I live on the Connecticut shoreline, its twisty, boney single track and I’m looking forward to killing it on my local trails! The reviews on the bike have been great and that’s in the desert! This bikes gonna destroy New England singletrack!
Do you know if the offset on the fork is different to counter the slack head angle? Something like Fishers offset? Also, is the wheel set tubeless ready?
Your reviews are always thorough and concise and I’m eager to hear your review of the bike.
Any input would help…
@GO-GO-GADGET: I am not sure what the fork offset actually is, but I would be surprised if it was longer than Fox’s typical offset. Whatever it is, I will have some interesting things to say about how the Mason handles. Let’s just put it this way- I was a bit surprised by what I found.
The rims on the Mason are WTB i23’s which are tubeless with a yellow rim tape available from WTB or Stan’s will work as well. WTB uses a UST dimension on their bead seat, by the way.
Nice to see DB slacking the headtube angle. The steep angle on the SC Tallboy LT makes it extremely unstable when pointed downhill at speed on rough terrain.
Are you sure about the tubeless capability of the wheels that come on the mason? I’m confident a stan’s conversion kit will work but the WTB i23 rims I got on my Mason do not have the TCS bead that WTB uses on their tubeless ready rims. From the pics you have up we have the same wheels. Just wondering, thanks!
-Kipp