<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMERICAN CLASSIC All Mountain 29&#8243;er Wheels: Final Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hsb3</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/#comment-79629</link>
		<dc:creator>hsb3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 22:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=12952#comment-79629</guid>
		<description>I have the xc version and wish I had gotten the all mountain. The xc rims are not made for aggressive riding at low pressure. I counted 11 dings in the rear and 7 in the front after one season of riding. They never lost any air until yesterday though, which is impressive. Time to replace the rims with the all mountain version I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the xc version and wish I had gotten the all mountain. The xc rims are not made for aggressive riding at low pressure. I counted 11 dings in the rear and 7 in the front after one season of riding. They never lost any air until yesterday though, which is impressive. Time to replace the rims with the all mountain version I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/#comment-78755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=12952#comment-78755</guid>
		<description>@c_g  Do you know a really light 36h 29er rim that wouls allow for such testing?

http://www.bikelugs.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail&amp;intItemID=405</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@c_g  Do you know a really light 36h 29er rim that wouls allow for such testing?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bikelugs.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail&#038;intItemID=405" rel="nofollow">http://www.bikelugs.com/store/index.php?strWebAction=item_detail&#038;intItemID=405</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solitone</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/#comment-77697</link>
		<dc:creator>solitone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=12952#comment-77697</guid>
		<description>Hi, and thanks for the nice review, it&#039;s much informative--as usual!

You speak of the hub engagement. How many degrees are needed for the free wheel to engage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, and thanks for the nice review, it&#8217;s much informative&#8211;as usual!</p>
<p>You speak of the hub engagement. How many degrees are needed for the free wheel to engage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c_g</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/#comment-75223</link>
		<dc:creator>c_g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 12:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=12952#comment-75223</guid>
		<description>@jkd: for more info on the ROCKY MOUNTAIN 970, simply search on this site - there is plenty there from the product release coverage early this summer and the test platform intro only a short while ago. be sure to se a lot more of this bike in the coming months :-).

@Davidcopperfield: I see your point but have little own expereince with 36h wheels (apart from what I rode in the good old days :-)). Given that the selection of hubs and rims for 36 h is growing smaller and smaller, I have never put too much time into testing this out. Do you know a really light 36h 29er rim that wouls allow for such testing?
Wider flange spacing and 142 mm specific hubs (not the 135 converted ones) would be another thing considering when increasing stiffness and strength is the prime objective. Ever thought about this one? 

For now it is safe to say that 32h is the most common pattern with 3x lacing and I for my part am fully OK with it.

Keep on exploring and questioning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jkd: for more info on the ROCKY MOUNTAIN 970, simply search on this site &#8211; there is plenty there from the product release coverage early this summer and the test platform intro only a short while ago. be sure to se a lot more of this bike in the coming months <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>@Davidcopperfield: I see your point but have little own expereince with 36h wheels (apart from what I rode in the good old days <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ). Given that the selection of hubs and rims for 36 h is growing smaller and smaller, I have never put too much time into testing this out. Do you know a really light 36h 29er rim that wouls allow for such testing?<br />
Wider flange spacing and 142 mm specific hubs (not the 135 converted ones) would be another thing considering when increasing stiffness and strength is the prime objective. Ever thought about this one? </p>
<p>For now it is safe to say that 32h is the most common pattern with 3x lacing and I for my part am fully OK with it.</p>
<p>Keep on exploring and questioning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidcopperfield</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2011/11/13/american-classic-all-mountain-tubeless-tcs-29er-wheels-final-review/#comment-75220</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidcopperfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=12952#comment-75220</guid>
		<description>I guess the rim would be possible ti be designed lighter when used with 36 spokes, but niw the extra weight in the rim is needed to make the wheel hold up. 32 are used on their 26er wheels, why all 29er wheels get the same spoke count as 26ers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the rim would be possible ti be designed lighter when used with 36 spokes, but niw the extra weight in the rim is needed to make the wheel hold up. 32 are used on their 26er wheels, why all 29er wheels get the same spoke count as 26ers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
