Here are my final thoughts on Salsa Cycles Mukluk fat-bike. This has been a long term test I began last winter. The bike has been ridden over the course of the late summer and all throughout the fall extensively and in many conditions- not just snow!
You can catch my Mid-Term report on this bike here if you missed that or need to catch up with this review.
After I swapped over to Salsa branded hubs on this test, I had no further wheel issues. So, I felt obliged to push the limits of where I could go on the bike now that hub failure was banished from my mind. Good thing, since this was the defining facet to the bike that I was missing out on when I was dealing with the originally spec’ed (by myself) hub set.
Essentially, the myth that these bicycles with the “monster truck sized tires” are “snow bikes” is selling this platform short. Waaaaay short! Through my own testing and some research I have become convinced that these types of bikes are truly deserving of the moniker “all terrain bike”. An outing with some friends early in the fall showed me that urban stunts, single track, gravel road riding, and general off the beaten path exploration are all well within the realm of possibilities with the Salsa Cycles Mukluk, or any fat bike, for that matter.
The Mukluk specifically is a great platform for exploratory outings which may be uncharted areas, or otherwise may take you through bits of trail that are difficult to impossible to ride on a “normal” 29″er. It is a stable handling rig and those tires eat up terrain that would stop a typical 29″er in its tracks. Deeper grounds, sand, mud, forest floor debris, and deep rock are easy to traverse on the Mukluk and bring rides into focus that you may never have considered before.
Add to this all the mounts for water bottles, (five water bottle mounts on the size Large reviewed), or the mounts for Salsa Cycles’ own “Anything Cage”, (Which holds dry bags or larger canisters), and rack mounts, and you have a bike that can also take you far away and bring along all the necessary things to self-support your adventure.
I have done a fair share of single track on this bike, and it isn’t a bad rig, but be prepared to work harder. The wheels are heavy, the steering will require a different technique, with counter-steering and some extra muscle, that your current rig doesn’t require of you. You will work harder on climbs, and you may need to check up that speed on rougher descents.
So, why even bother? Two things: “Fun”, and the ability to ride the “unrideable” terrain which makes the Mukluk “more fun”. If you are thinking this will be a fast, nimble, light weight, look elsewhere. (Likely you have not even read this far anyway, if that describes you.
) However; if you are looking for something to spark your riding, inspire you to look at alternative choices in terrain, and something that can keep you riding all winter, look no further than the Mukluk.
Since this review kicked off, Salsa Cycles has released new 2012 models which include a titanium frame choice. Surly Bikes has also released a couple of new models as well as three new choices in tires, bringing the total of tire choices up to five models from the two that existed when I started this test. So, you have options now as well, making the Mukluk, or fat-bikes in general, more appealing. Look for even more companies to jump on this niche in the future.
Conclusions: After several months of riding this bike in conditions ranging from deep snow and negative 10 below zero Fahrenheit to dry single track in 80 degree weather, I can say with authority that this is a bike one could ride exclusively all year around. Would that make sense for you? I can’t say it would. Obviously, there are better choices for single track, racing, or AM/Trail riding than a Mukluk. However; if you have seen some places that you can’t ride and wished you could- sandy beaches, snowy trails, bogs, muddy areas, (within reason!), or if you just want that option, a Mukluk would be an excellent addition to your stable of rigs.
I suppose it could be your “stable killer” if you built up a second 29″er wheel set and swapped in a suspension fork for the summer months. That’s a possibility that I have not (yet) explored, but may make a Mukluk even more appealing. As it stands though, I think this is a bike that is a second, third, or fourth bike for most riders.
If you start getting into the nitty-gritty of fat-bikes, you may run into some limitations, such as drive train/tire interference issues, “Q factor” issues, or parts that are scarce due to the proprietary nature of fat-bike platforms. (My hub issues illustrate this to a small degree.) However; the Mukluk is a pretty well thought out machine that allows for the best combination of parts to be used for most riders. It isn’t perfectly free from compromises- no fat-bike truly is- but Salsa Cycles did their homework here, and it shows.
It is awfully fun to ride though, and if you have a notion to try a Mukluk, I can say it may be the most fun you’ve had on a bike in a long time. They are very capable machines with abilities unlike most mountain bikes, and with limitations that many bikes do not have. However; they are also bikes with a “fun-factor” that is unmatched by almost any bike you can think of in the mountain bike/all terrain category. From a fat-bike perspective, Salsa Cycles has put together a winner.
Note: The Salsa Cycles Mukluk is my personal bike. This bike was not submitted to Twenty Nine Inches by Salsa Cycles for test/review. I will strive to give my honest opinions and thoughts throughout.













I ride my fat bike all year. Not riding it in the summer is a mistake. They are also great bikes for those days when you should ride but don’t feel like riding because they are a blast. Also just got a Nate tire that I know will make dirt riding even more fun.
Yup, I’ve even been seen on a road training ride with my FATBACK, with full pressure in the tires they roll like an 18 wheeler, and you will hear “Car Back” from the group quite frequently until they get used to the loud buzz of the Surly tires at 25 mph…
Lance, if you can pedal a Fatback at 25mph on pavement, you are in damned good shape… But I agree, I rode my Pug right through the summer, on road, single track, beach, and everything in between. It’s hard to articulate the fun factor here, but once you’ve ridden one, it’s undeniable for most.
@lance – hahaha, I know you aren’t kidding about the noise! Especially on gravel roads, they really do sound like a car rolling down the road.
@Jim in SF: Allow me to brag on Lance a bit
I happen to be acquainted with him, and he is an excellent and hardy athlete. Look up what he did last year in the Iditarod bike race, http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/iowa-tough-guy-ends-hospital-after-iditarod-invitational
He’s well acquainted with fat-bikes and capable of making them go fast, I think.
what do you mean by “check up on the descents?”
@dave: Fat-bike tires are essentially “un-damped suspension”. So, if things get too bumpy too quickly, you may find yourself out of control on descents.
GT…..thanks for the reports. Great job.
Hills versus a regular 29er: Can you give a guesstimate as to how much harder longish or steepish hills would be on the Mukluk versus a regular 29er? I know it’s subjective,but curious if it’s 5% or 20% or 75%.
No front shock: I might have missed it in your report, but what’s the theory of no front shock on a fat bike? Cost:? Not needed? ???? Going over ruts, etc. how does the Fat Bike feel versus a front shock 29er?
Fat Bike/ Short Rider: Do you see any constraints for a shortish rider? I’m 5’6 but walk tall.
Cheers
Another votr of support for the remarkable capabilities of fat bikes here. I am not an owner and was a sceptic till I rode one on my local heavy rock, stepped and clay terrain. The beasts really fly on rough stuff. Sections of sand/clay and rock that would challenge a front sus 29er with 2.2 rubber were consumed by the machine!
Still, not a bike for everyone. I’m too much of a weenie to tolerate such heft day to day and found the steering too challenging. Mind you that was an older surley pugsley with larry rubber.
For touring bad terrain heartily agree that there is nothing better. To ride one with roadies..hats of to you LanceAndre!
Jaysus GT! I just read that article. Lance Andre you are the King of HARD MAN! I salute you !
SloJoe, if the hill has a loose or rough surface I don’t think you are slowed at all by using a fatbike.
I only notice the extra weight and width of the fat wheels on surfaced or hardpack roads.
Generally the only time I notice the extra weight in my fatbikes is when I have to lift them over a fence, but I now have my singlespeed one down to 26lbs, so that’s not too much of a penalty.
How does the ride compare to say a Specialized Epic 29er in terms of feeling “beat up” after riding? Does it ride like a rigid aluminum hardtail with bigger tires or does the “float” take the edge off?
Nice write up GT!!
I’m entering my 4th winter with my Pugs, and the riding one can do on a FatBike is almost limitless.
If you like exploring, or taking the trail less or non traveled, a Fattie is for you!!!
Since I bought my FatBike, all my other bikes are hanging in the garage.
Pedal On!!
Peace…..
Thx for the writeup – intriguing!
As I know of no shop hereabouts (Germany) having any fatbikes at all to try out easily: Is there a difference between a Mukluk and a Pugsley, for a rider with 220lbs and 6’5″, or should I just try to get on either one, to get the feel of it? TIA, tobi…
Well i was curious about the descending from a control standpoint. See, I ride a rigid SS with 2.4 Purgatory on the front. So to me, I would think that I could descend a whole lot quicker on a fat bike with big honking low-pressure tires.
@SloJoeRecumbo: It’s about the weight. A really light fat-bike barely cracks the 30lb barrier. So, if you’ve pedaled a heavy bike up hills, that would be my best comparison to give you. You will work harder to move a heavier bike than a lighter one. Simple physics at work that can not be ignored.
As for shocks, there are those few that are running old Maverick SC 32′s and modded Cannondale Lefty’s, so it can be accomplished, and riders report better dry conditions “real mountain biking” experiences. For softer conditions like snow, mud, sand, it isn’t necessary.
Unfortunately though, there is no “off the peg” suspension fork choice as of this posting for fat-bikes.
For shorter folks, it isn’t a problem to find a fat-bike to fit. The Mukluk, reviewed here, comes in a size 13″ !
@Chsad: I rode this Mukluk literally all day long on one occasion and did not feel beat up at all. My take is that you may feel worked over after a long trail ride, but it would be due to weight and the necessary muscle required to move that and keep it under control, since again- that bouncing front and rear wheel are not damped, and you will need extra force to work this bike around corners and obstacles as well.
@tobi: A Pugs has a bit quicker feel to the handling, but otherwise the bikes are close to each other. By the way, Sandman Bikes in Belgium does fat-bikes. Might be worth a look.
@Dave: You may be able to go faster, it just depends upon the trail and conditions. Rougher, solid, chunky stuff will make these tires want to bounce. That’s uncontrolled rebound. Your body will need to deal with that. If you are skilled in the ways of letting your body be the damper, you may go fast. Otherwise, checking up your speed on descents will allow better control.
Understood. What kind of tire pressure do you run? How low can you go without bottoming the tire on the rim?
@SloJoeRecumbo: It’s about the weight. A really light fat-bike barely cracks the 30lb barrier. So, if you’ve pedaled a heavy bike up hills, that would be my best comparison to give you. You will work harder to move a heavier bike than a lighter one. Simple physics at work that can not be ignored.
I hears ya. Me was just wondering how you “thought % wise” it compared to say your 29er if you had to put a number n it. I’m slow up hills and was even on a DF. My friends got tired of saying: “We’ll wait for you at the top”
Am in South Africa with a Motobecane 29er and have to decide to either bring that home and use it or sell it and get a FAT when I get home. Can only have one, so I’m definitely leaning to the FAT BIKE for the versatility. Hey, at 67 and just started mountain biking, I can do slow.
@Dave: Tire pressures can be run so low that standard bicycle pump gauges can’t accurately record the psi! I’ve seen a friend run his so low the sidewalls flexed like a drag car’s slicks. With a proper low pressure gauge, you can air down to 5psi for softer conditions and be safe. Rocks and rougher grounds may require airing up to a dizzying 10psi or so.
The upper pressure limits for paved riding are in the 20′s psi. Anything higher is just not necessary, wise, or fun to ride.
Tire pressures I have run have never been over 10psi for the entire test period.
@SloJoeRecumbo: 67? Ride On!
My hats off to you. Gear down and spin up those hills and enjoy the ride.
Great report! Now if I had a “quiver” of 8-10 bikes, a fat bike would be one of them.
“Hey Bubba, want to go down to the swamp and see who can ride through deeper muck”….
The tractor-pull of bikes! After phat bikes and 36′rs there is nothing left, final frontier….what will the bike companies do to move product?
Please educate me: what is unwise about running the tires at 30 PSI on pavement?
@Don: Those big, fat tires get really bouncy at that pressure, as you effectively remove their ability to be suspension at that sort of pressure. They will become more like basketballs, and much less like tires. Make sense?
A fatbike is the next bike on my list, but I have to “get a job” first… I’m close. Keep your fingers crossed, as I also have an SC32 that I’d like to set up to run on the front of a Moonlander if we can make it all work out…
Fingers crossed…
Great review buddy. Glad you are enjoying the frameset.
Thanks GT, and after reading that article, damn Lance, you are craaaaaaazy! In a good way.
I thought I was being manly when I rode home a few miles from the trail with a couple of broken ribs last month, can’t imagine riding for a full day or more with a broken arm and a broken leg! Youz tha man.
@MG: Thanks Man! I am enjoying it…. a lot!
Oh….and fingers crossed and more for you.
I bought a Salsa Mukluk 2 with the idea that it would be my winter bike, only to discover that I plan on riding it all year for anything less than 25 miles, I’ll use the trekking bike for distance beyond that.
Fatbikes are surprisingly well-adapted to urban riding. Those with aluminum frames are incredibly light, and the low gearing meant to drive up hills means you can accelerate very quickly on pavement. The 26″ rims get an additional 3″ rise from the tires, so it’s like riding a 29er with a 4″ wide footprint. It has the effect of totally redefining the urban landscape for a cyclist-no need to worry about potholes or drainage grates anymore. I can ride over a curb without having to “pop a wheelie” over it.
Plus, it’s a blast to ride, and some bikes like the Mukluk 2 are designed to avoid chain/tire rub (the Mukluk 3, not so much). The only downsides I’ve come across are:
1) There’s a trampoline effect with the front wheel in certain conditions on single track, although it should also be noted I’m riding on what is considered the most technical track in the state (it’s all I have to choose from, there’s only one MTB site in town) and I’m new to to MTB trails.
2) The drivetrain seems to be extended beyond the typical length, probably to get around the tires, so you legs or pant legs make above average contact with the grease on the chain.
3) Fatbikes are a HUGE conversation starter. Don’t get one if you are unwilling to have a conversation with someone every time you ride.
4) Some MTB riders will get jealous and be kind of a dick.
I was looking at picking up the Salsa Mukluk 2 for daily winter riding (30 miles a day) here in the Twin Cities. The only thing I was concerned about is buying a brand new one @ $2200.00 and find out at the end of the season I need to replace the parts from all the snow etc. My question is how do you keep all the components from rusting out and looking like crap when it is a daily winter rider? How harsh is the snow on the bike? Any suggestions or experience with this anyone. Please send a follow up comment if you have one. Thxs for your help…
@Mukluk: I have commuted in snowy weather since about 2003 onwards. If you get into snowy, slushy, treated snow, or “car snow’, (that ugly mush that is grey colored from vehicular traffic), then what I do is knock off all the excess stuff sticking to the down tube, BB area, and elsewhere right after arriving where I am going. Then I let it slowly warm up. (This isn’t always possible, but bringing the bike into a semi-heated area first is preferred so you don’t get a lot of internal condensation, which can lead to premature parts failures)
Then when the bike dries out, I hit the chain with some lube, and clean the bike thoroughly once a week or so in between. Using a quality chain helps. I recommend Wipperman stainless steel chains for being rust resistant and resistant to road chemicals.
But there is no two ways about it. Winter is harsh on bicycles in the upper latitudes and you’ll replace parts more frequently.
I ride my pug al year , @ 28# of air I can Cruz @13,14,15, mph al day and leave pavement at 15 mph. to hit the dirt. Oh ps. I’m 63 yo. Live in Az. Have 10. Bis.this is my goto.
I’ve clocked myself at about 50mph on a steep descent with large loose rocks on my mukluk, and while it may not be the bike of choice for long sustained climbs, it can climb pitches other bikes would cringe at, due to the epic amount of fat tire traction. The stability also makes small drops significantly easier. These things rip!
Great review! Thank you (I think?) for dispelling the notion that fatbikes are only for snow. That was pretty much my last excuse for not lusting after one; I live in Louisville, KY, where we rarely have sufficient snow to make a snow-specific bike worthwhile.
Floating over various kinds of rough stuff on 29″ balloons sounds like my kind of fun. I think one of these might find its way into my (currently very road-oriented) stable some day.
Thanks for the great review. The only thing I can add is that the Mukluk is, indeed, the ATV of cycling. It is also a great race machine. For my 15th finish of the Leadville Trail 100 MTB race in 2011 I rode my new Salsa Mukluk and finish my 15th LT100 in 11 hours and 27 minutes. For my 16th finish of the LT100 in August of 2012 I will ride my Mukluk again and try to break 11 hours. I am very proud to be the only person in the World to have accomplished this huge task…but more important at the age of 63. The young fast guys and gals could do this…the big question for them would be “WHY”. Salsa Mukluk is not just for snow…it is for everything that you would call FUN…It is my giggle bike…and it will get you in AWSOME Cycling Fitness…game on…Doc
Does anyone know how a Fortune Hanebrink compares to a traditional fat tire bike like a Mukluk? They seem like two different takes on the same concept.
Anyone try a Mukluk with standard, 29er wheels on it? I’m thinking about killing two birds with one stone here, but am curious to know how she handles with 29″ 1.9-2.3 sized tires. Also, where would I have them built?
thnx
Alex
@Huggies: Actually, I’m working on that very thing right now.
There will be a test of some upcoming pre-built 29″er wheels on the same type of hubs a Mukluk uses here on TNI. We’re just waiting for the wheels to be built, and then we’ll announce the test. Stay tuned!
Just got home from riding Beverly Park in Cedar Rapids with my girlfriend. We both have Mukluks and they are our daily riders. We ride em everywhere!
In your First Impressions post about the Mukluk there was discussion about how packed snow was needed to ride on snow. My bike came with 2 Larrys and they washed out like mad on fresh snow. I bought a pair of Nates and never had a problem with fresh snow again. Now that the weather has turned, I put a Larry on the back and kept a Nate on the front. Smiles all around!
Also, fatbikes seem to handle better with alt-bars, like the On-One Mary. My girlfriend and I both use this bar and it makes it so much easier to throw the bike around, loft the front end, and get the front end leaned over hard in the corners.
Happy fatbiking!
Good report!
Also worth mentioning is how well fat bikes ride when loaded up with camping gear compared to a regular bike, making them great for adventures.
They are indeed All Terrain Bicycles -:)