With the Singular Cycles Gryphon review now complete, I thought it might be helpful to put the Gryphon and the Fargo up against each other in a head to head comparison. These two 29 inch wheeled rigs are very similar bicycles, but they do differ in important ways. Obviously, the fact that these are both drop bar specific designs figures heavily into their similarities. But beyond the obvious, there is much more that may surprise you in the comparison of these two models.

fargo2010 001gryphonfinale 002
The Contenders: Although the Salsa Cycles Fargo pre-dates the Gryphon in the consciousness of riders, the fact of the matter is that the Gryphon and the Fargo were in development at the same time, making their similarities all the more amazing. Both conceived of as drop bar specific designs, the Fargo and the Gryphon are also not designed with suspension forks in mind. This sets both bikes apart from the rest of the 29″er herd already. While the reasoning for such bicycles may escape some readers, I am not going to delve into that here. This report will focus on which of these two bicycles might work for you. You’ll have to figure out if any of these bikes makes sense beforehand.

The Similarities: While it is obvious in some respects, these two bikes are more closely related than you may think in detailed ways as well. Take a look at some of the numbers. (Comparing size Large from each company. Specs from the companies respective websites)

Effective Top Tube Fargo-585mm Gryphon-591.9mm
Head Angle Fargo-70* Gryphon-70.5*
Seat Tube Angle Fargo-72* Gryphon-72.5*
Head Tube Length Fargo-190mm Gryphon-154.7mm
Chain Stay Length Fargo-465mm Gryphon-445mm
Fork Offset Fargo-55mm Gryphon-55mm
Fork Axle To Crown Fargo-440mm Gryphon-445mm

I find the numbers for these two bikes rather telling. Considering that neither was aware of the others decisions during the development process, and it is even more interesting. The Singular is designed as a “Bike for just riding”, an “all-rounder off road rig”, if you will, while the Fargo had a more specific touring bent in its design- An off-roader capable of carrying a load. So even with these different distinctions going in, the numbers come out very similarly, and not surprisingly, so does the ride performance.

The Differences: That said, there are obvious places where the two bikes are really different. Upon glancing at the numbers, the chain stay length, the head tube length, and effective top tube lengths may jump out at you. To my mind, the biggest difference maker in all of these numbers is the chain stay length, and this in particular affects how the Fargo rides off road in comparison to the Gryphon most dramatically. The Fargo feels longer back there, and in comparison to a Gryphon, it doesn’t feel as easily led around a corner, or that it pins the rear wheel as well on a climb. Certainly, the Gryphon’s slightly steeper geometry also lends a feeling of quickness, but it is how the back ends of these bikes feel different that is most noticeable to my mind.

Ritcheybarmarch 001

The head tube length isn’t all that big a deal, other than it does allow for a higher front handle bar position on a Fargo without resorting to a ton of spacers. The Gryphon supports a racier position with its shorter head tube. Effective top tube length on the Gryphon does a similar thing, although, a slightly longer stem with less, (or no), spacers under the stem would approximate a similar position on a Fargo should that be desirable.

Finally, there are the obvious details which separate the bikes, and their intended purposes, like the water bottle mount positions, the rack and fender braze ons, or lack of them, and how each company views geared and single speed set ups. The Fargo is the “Swiss Army Knife” in terms of versatility, with the glaring exception of not easily being made into a single speed, or internally geared bike. (Note: It can be done, but not without slight compromises.) The Gryphon is more……ahem!singular in its purpose, (Sorry! Couldn’t resist!), and strangely enough offers multiple options for drive train set ups with ease. One would think the “perfect” Fargo would have the drive train options of the Gryphon, while the Gryphon, being a bike for “just riding”, might offer rack and fender braze ons. Hmm…………

The Ride: And then it all comes down to the way they ride. I have already hinted at the issue in regards to chain stay length, but there are other differences as well. My feeling is that these bikes have very different ride qualities based upon frame tubing choices. The Singular’s frame tubing is of smaller diameter, and it is more flexible in the way you like to see a steel bike flex. That springiness that gives something back to the rider as you pedal along. This same feeling doesn’t really happen on an unloaded Fargo. However; used in its intended purpose as a load bearing, off road beast, and you will feel similar feelings as you would on a unladen Gryphon. The Fargo is definitely a stiffer bike than a Gryphon bare naked, without any touring load. That might just appeal to some folks who like a more rigid chassis, and to be perfectly honest, the Fargo still feels like a steel bike. It’s just not as compliant as a Gryphon.

In some cases, the longer Fargo is more comfortable, actually. Especially in choppy terrain, where the slightly longer wheel base keeps things more in check than they are on a Gryphon. Sometimes the less stretched out, and more easily attainable upright position of the Fargo is also greatly appreciated. Slight differences to be sure, but these may tip the scale for some riders one way or the other when comparing these two off road drop bar 29″ers.

As far as steering, these two bikes are so similar it is hard to say which I am riding in that regard. Not surprising when the numbers are almost identical for the front ends of these bikes. Again, the Gryphon, designed for unloaded riding, has a more supple fork, but that is to be expected here. Other than that, the Fargo and Gryphon can both be at once quick steering, yet stable as well. Oddly enough, the combination of big wheels and short fork trail figures seem well suited to each other.

Conclusions: It is a niche of a niche of a niche, but even so, drop bar 29″ers have already made a big splash, and are gaining some more members to the “club”. (Rawland Draakar, Van Dessel WTF) Some of this may have to do with adventuring by bicycle, or perhaps the 29″er fans desire to “be different”, or because of an outgrowth of the “monster cross” craze. Who knows why, but the Fargo and the Gryphon have to be seen as the leaders in this area. They also have strong ties to earlier mountain bike and road bike ideals stemming back to the 19th century. Certainly, it is a style of bicycle that either sets the imagination to running, or causes confusion as to “why”.

If you happen to be one of those drawn to this style of bicycle, either one of these well designed, nice riding bicycles would come with a high recommendation from me. I would advise that intentions for your riding and goals for your riding determine which model to pick. Are you riding just for fun? Maybe you want to race this style of bicycle? Perhaps light weight is a goal of yours? Then those ideals may steer you towards a Gryphon. If you want to go into the back country, camp, be self supported, or do an adventure race, like the Tour Divide, then maybe a Fargo will be your bicycle of choice. Either way, these two pioneers of drop bar specific 29″ers are great bikes to own and ride.

For more information see: Salsa Cycles Fargo page. Singular Cycles Gryphon page.