<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ragley Bikes Announces Rigid Only Titanium 29&#8243;er</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/#comment-65708</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4983#comment-65708</guid>
		<description>Nice! All props to the rigid only design. Personally not to crazy about the bent seat tube since I find longer stays much more beneficial on my 29ers.  I am a bike addict, but i have to say I would never buy another Lynsey ti bike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! All props to the rigid only design. Personally not to crazy about the bent seat tube since I find longer stays much more beneficial on my 29ers.  I am a bike addict, but i have to say I would never buy another Lynsey ti bike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain bob</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/#comment-65695</link>
		<dc:creator>captain bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4983#comment-65695</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brant</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/#comment-65692</link>
		<dc:creator>brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 06:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4983#comment-65692</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that will be a problem for some riders, Captain Bob. This is an unashamedly ass-up, head-down race weapon. Not a bars-higher, see-where-you&#039;re-going machine.

Headtube on the 20in frame is just 4.5in. I think you&#039;ll find this model a little uncomfy, or requiring an oddly tall stem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that will be a problem for some riders, Captain Bob. This is an unashamedly ass-up, head-down race weapon. Not a bars-higher, see-where-you&#8217;re-going machine.</p>
<p>Headtube on the 20in frame is just 4.5in. I think you&#8217;ll find this model a little uncomfy, or requiring an oddly tall stem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: captain bob</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/#comment-65687</link>
		<dc:creator>captain bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4983#comment-65687</guid>
		<description>I have come to really love rigid bikes.  However, I had a raleigh xxix g and is was based off the same fork length and I could never get the bar height right without using a riser stem with a riser bar or a crap load of spacers.  That was with a 110mm headtube.  My other rigid only bikes are designed around 465 a/c forks and seem to work just right for me.  
Brant, what would the headtube length be for about a 19 or 20inch frame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have come to really love rigid bikes.  However, I had a raleigh xxix g and is was based off the same fork length and I could never get the bar height right without using a riser stem with a riser bar or a crap load of spacers.  That was with a 110mm headtube.  My other rigid only bikes are designed around 465 a/c forks and seem to work just right for me.<br />
Brant, what would the headtube length be for about a 19 or 20inch frame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WKilburg</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2010/03/03/ragley-bikes-announces-rigid-only-titanium-29er/#comment-65686</link>
		<dc:creator>WKilburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4983#comment-65686</guid>
		<description>Thats an interesting frame and concept in building only rigid versions. I sort of like the idea actually in that I&#039;m currently shopping for a rigid only single speed frame - the TD-1 though is way over budget, still it would a kick to ride one. 

Nice job Brant, I&#039;ll be watching here and checking around mtbr where I first saw the the TD-1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats an interesting frame and concept in building only rigid versions. I sort of like the idea actually in that I&#8217;m currently shopping for a rigid only single speed frame &#8211; the TD-1 though is way over budget, still it would a kick to ride one. </p>
<p>Nice job Brant, I&#8217;ll be watching here and checking around mtbr where I first saw the the TD-1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

