<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten 29&#8243;er Products Of &#8217;09: Continental Race King Tire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:11:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: craig</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/#comment-65313</link>
		<dc:creator>craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4368#comment-65313</guid>
		<description>Just mounted a pair last night that I purchased in Jan &#039;10.  True width is 1.9 on both tires.  Absolutely no stretching overnight.No way these tires could ever be considered 2.2&quot;.  Hard to believe I got old stock a year after they pulled their first production run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just mounted a pair last night that I purchased in Jan &#8217;10.  True width is 1.9 on both tires.  Absolutely no stretching overnight.No way these tires could ever be considered 2.2&#8243;.  Hard to believe I got old stock a year after they pulled their first production run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/#comment-64710</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4368#comment-64710</guid>
		<description>@Ben: Well, in a round about way, they have signed off. What they said was (paraphrased- not an exact quote here) that their tires were compatible with all currently available sealants for tires. 

One can logically surmise that tires need not be compatible with sealant unless you are running the tires tubeless. So, Continental doesn&#039;t specifically use the term &quot;tubeless&quot; but patently has allowed that it can be done with their tires. 

In my experience there has been zero issues in doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben: Well, in a round about way, they have signed off. What they said was (paraphrased- not an exact quote here) that their tires were compatible with all currently available sealants for tires. </p>
<p>One can logically surmise that tires need not be compatible with sealant unless you are running the tires tubeless. So, Continental doesn&#8217;t specifically use the term &#8220;tubeless&#8221; but patently has allowed that it can be done with their tires. </p>
<p>In my experience there has been zero issues in doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/#comment-64709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4368#comment-64709</guid>
		<description>Mark, 

I know people run them tubeless, but has Conti signed off on that officially?  A TLR sort of thing?

Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>I know people run them tubeless, but has Conti signed off on that officially?  A TLR sort of thing?</p>
<p>Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c_g</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/12/23/top-ten-29er-products-of-09-continental-race-king-tire/#comment-64706</link>
		<dc:creator>c_g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=4368#comment-64706</guid>
		<description>GT, I ca fully back up what you say with my own set of Race Kings. For the rear, they are really versatile, for the front I can run them on a lot of conditions but when things get wewt or rogh I prefer a more aggressive tread. Cornering control is the biggest complaint - more notably up front.

My 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT, I ca fully back up what you say with my own set of Race Kings. For the rear, they are really versatile, for the front I can run them on a lot of conditions but when things get wewt or rogh I prefer a more aggressive tread. Cornering control is the biggest complaint &#8211; more notably up front.</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

