The green and white Scott 29″er was a newcomer to the 29″er world. Is it a good first effort? Read on for some thoughts from us on this aluminum rig.
Grannygear’s Thoughts: Coming off of the Hei Hei, the Scott felt like a missile. It was a 19” size (I had been riding XL/21” bikes all weekend) but it still was a very decent fit for me as I kinda’ waffle between L and XL sizes. Hydroformed aluminum may be getting lost in the shadows of the tower of excitement over carbon frames, but don’t sell shaped beer can technology short just yet. It can have surprisingly good all around performance and hit a price point that high quality carbon cannot touch. The Giant XTC 29er 1 has shown me that and the Scott just confirmed it. Run your hand over the down tube and you can feel the shape change along its length. The Scale had a standard dropout Reba and no tapered head tube. However, it had Avid Elixir brakes and an XT rear dérailleur. After riding all the thru-axle QR Fox forks and tapered head tubes, I wondered if I would feel that in the performance of the Scott. Nope. The Scale has a very stiff and accurate front end. The rear end was tucked underneath very nicely and I never measured the rear stays, but the nicely bent seat tube allowed for a short back end that made it easy to pick up the front wheel and place it where you wanted it and it climbed like a scared rabbit. It was light, stiff, fun, fast and quite competitive in a world bristling with carbon wunderbikes. In fact, if it was my money and I had groceries to buy, I would buy this as a race bike in a second and put the money saved into my kid’s college fund or something. Not only that, it looks great too.
Guitar Ted’s Thoughts: I had heard about Scott entering the 29″er ranks and because of their jaw dropping lightweight carbon steeds, I figured that a carbon hard tail 29″er might just be the thing they would do to blow the roof off of the XC 29″er ranks. Nope! They come out with a middle priced aluminum rig. Huh. Well, it looks really great as Scott managed to pull together a nice graphics package right down to the color matching decals on the Rock Shox Reba fork.
The bike fit me great and off I went. First thing I noticed was that this pony wants to run! The harder I pedaled it the better it felt, and the faster I went. Solid. Yeah, that’s another thing I felt. The front end of this bike resists twisting and flexing really well which translated into a precise steering feel. I don’t know what Scott is using for a head angle, but this bike is a fast steering machine. Very racy feeling.
The slightly bent seat tube and shorter rear end translated into great climbing and the wheelies were easy to pop on this rig. Climbing didn’t show any negative effects as I could easily keep the front end pinned right where I needed it. The only weird thing about the Scott was that it was shod with ExiWolf tires, which I haven’t seen much of for a couple of years now.
The Scott guys told me that dealers snapped up all the Scott Scale 29″er units available and I am betting that after a few folks get these out on the trail, the bikes will become very popular with riders as well. It is a great riding, good looking piece that will do someone well as an XC racer on the weekends and as a fun trail bike too.
















I want a SS version with sliders.
Glad to see that the 29er version of the Scale is keeping it’s roots as being a stiff bike. I think it’ll make a great dirt crit/race bike. With all the collapsing going on last year, they may have gone the safe route of building an Al frame first rather than investing in new carbon moulds etc.
Nah, let them mix it up with a superlight carbon hardtail, something that would lure their top riders onto it. Who races alu at top level anymore anyway? Then, who wants small wheels for racing?
Scott is clearly experimenting with a format that is new to them and checking the market response. In other words, they are not too confident yet and that warrants no big investments in a carbon frame. Yet. Same with Giant. In the mean time let’s enjoy the bikes and watch their progress.
Been looking in the scott 2010 catalogue online. Can’t find this bike. Anybody know where I can get some sizes, geometry online?
This is a great looking bike! Just having a hard time finding a local dealer with one instock to demo/test ride. Hey Guitar Ted, how is the standover on the Scale 29er? I am 5’8″ w/ a 30 inch inseam and was wondering if I should get the small or medium?
@James12345: At your stated dimensions I would seriously consider the medium.
Stand over was good on the Large I rode.
Guitar Ted
I have the exact same measurements as you an I went with a medium… Fit is top notch and this bike is hands down one of he best I’ve ever had…and thats coming off a carbon stumpjumper… this bike is just a dream in the rough stuff
I just purchased the Scott Scale 29″er this weekend and put 4 hours in the saddle… wow! I’m loving this bike. It’s very fast and stable, yet nimble enough too. I’m small (5’4″ and 125 Lbs.) and the small size frame fit me well. I’ve been riding road and cyclocross bikes for two years but wanted to get a nice off-road bike for the summer. I test rode the Giant and Gary Fisher bikes which are nice but the Scott was a much better fit for me. Sooo glad I got this bike! Mine came with Schwalbe Racing Ralph tires. It’s all stock, just put on my pedals and some SKS fenders so I can rock thru the wet Portland spring months.
I’m actually selling my Scale 29′er…has 2 rides on it… Something came up and I need the money. first $1300 takes it, includes a new set of Scott MTB PRO Shoes size 8.5…
cpool324@comcast.net
let me know if interested, I’m in NH
Can you ship it? What size?
The Bike shop purchased the 29er back… if interested contact DG Cycle Sports in Epping, NH 603.734.5788
Ask for Charlie… the bike is a medium, he has 2 mediums and 1 large left… looks like Scott sold out of the 29er’s so what he has is all that is available…