<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bontrager 29-3 Tires: On Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fo</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/#comment-60681</link>
		<dc:creator>Fo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2493#comment-60681</guid>
		<description>I got me a set of FR3s :&gt;) booyah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got me a set of FR3s :&gt;) booyah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fo</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/#comment-60652</link>
		<dc:creator>Fo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2493#comment-60652</guid>
		<description>cool...thanks!

I will probably wait for the FR3 as a front...this is for what i would label, as pathetic as the label is, an &quot;AM&quot; intended bike so i really would LOVE the FR3, or a 2.4 Ardent if I can get on the prototype list or otherwise. 

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool&#8230;thanks!</p>
<p>I will probably wait for the FR3 as a front&#8230;this is for what i would label, as pathetic as the label is, an &#8220;AM&#8221; intended bike so i really would LOVE the FR3, or a 2.4 Ardent if I can get on the prototype list or otherwise. </p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/#comment-60650</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2493#comment-60650</guid>
		<description>Fo, the FR-3 is definitely a manly tire - they really rail, and they are big, and heavy.  Also, you need to ensure they&#039;ll actually fit your frame (if your frame can accommodate a WTB WeirWolf 2.55 with room to spare, then you&#039;ll probably be ok - see the pics I mentioned above to clarify).

In the meantime though, I&#039;d definitely check out the 29-3 front tire, it&#039;s the other one I&#039;ve been running.  It doesn&#039;t rail corners quite as well, but it&#039;s very fast rolling, and is still pretty darn huge.  It&#039;s labeled as a 2.25 instead of the FR-3&#039;s 2.35, but it&#039;s still very good volume and really worth checking out.  Depending on  your conditions, I&#039;d run the 29-3 instead (it&#039;s what I plan to run on my Jet 9 once that arrives (hopefully September).  I&#039;ve run the 29-3 front tire both front and rear (as a pair), and that&#039;s great.  The 29-3 rear is supposedly actually quite an excellent tire for climbing and traction wise, but it&#039;s just too small for me, I like the big &#039;uns.

Oh, also, if you can run them tubeless, that&#039;s even better :)  They mount up and run tubeless with sealant really well - I was able to use a pump and easy mount them on C29ssmax wheels, and that let me run them all at quite low pressure as mentioned above.  Since that comment above, I&#039;ve verified that I was running about 13/18 on the FR-3&#039;s and about 5psi higher for the 29-3&#039;s, maybe a shade more on the rear tires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fo, the FR-3 is definitely a manly tire &#8211; they really rail, and they are big, and heavy.  Also, you need to ensure they&#8217;ll actually fit your frame (if your frame can accommodate a WTB WeirWolf 2.55 with room to spare, then you&#8217;ll probably be ok &#8211; see the pics I mentioned above to clarify).</p>
<p>In the meantime though, I&#8217;d definitely check out the 29-3 front tire, it&#8217;s the other one I&#8217;ve been running.  It doesn&#8217;t rail corners quite as well, but it&#8217;s very fast rolling, and is still pretty darn huge.  It&#8217;s labeled as a 2.25 instead of the FR-3&#8242;s 2.35, but it&#8217;s still very good volume and really worth checking out.  Depending on  your conditions, I&#8217;d run the 29-3 instead (it&#8217;s what I plan to run on my Jet 9 once that arrives (hopefully September).  I&#8217;ve run the 29-3 front tire both front and rear (as a pair), and that&#8217;s great.  The 29-3 rear is supposedly actually quite an excellent tire for climbing and traction wise, but it&#8217;s just too small for me, I like the big &#8216;uns.</p>
<p>Oh, also, if you can run them tubeless, that&#8217;s even better <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   They mount up and run tubeless with sealant really well &#8211; I was able to use a pump and easy mount them on C29ssmax wheels, and that let me run them all at quite low pressure as mentioned above.  Since that comment above, I&#8217;ve verified that I was running about 13/18 on the FR-3&#8242;s and about 5psi higher for the 29-3&#8242;s, maybe a shade more on the rear tires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fo</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/#comment-60649</link>
		<dc:creator>Fo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2493#comment-60649</guid>
		<description>thanks chris. it looks like a manly tire so i was really hoping...though my current project is a custom frame so it&#039;ll take a while so mabe timing will work out..lol

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks chris. it looks like a manly tire so i was really hoping&#8230;though my current project is a custom frame so it&#8217;ll take a while so mabe timing will work out..lol</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/04/20/bontrager-29-3-tires-on-test/#comment-60648</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2493#comment-60648</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the FR-3&#039;s are available just yet, but probably pretty soon.  They are available as a 26&quot; I think, but I don&#039;t believe purchasable as a 29er tire yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the FR-3&#8242;s are available just yet, but probably pretty soon.  They are available as a 26&#8243; I think, but I don&#8217;t believe purchasable as a 29er tire yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

