<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hutchinson Toro 29?er Tubeless Ready Tire: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hutchinson-toro-29%25e2%2580%25b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 08:09:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Karyg</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/#comment-61804</link>
		<dc:creator>Karyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2243#comment-61804</guid>
		<description>I got a set of Toro&#039;s cheap on ebay and have ridden them for a couple of weeks.  I live in Carson City, NV, so I ride dry rocky/sandy conditions.  The tire is definitely not 2.1.  It looks more like a 1.95 especially compared to my Nevegals.  I have these mounted on DT 470 rims, set up tubeless.  So far, I am happy with the grip and control even for the narrow profile.  They hold air beautifully.  The biggest difference compared to my Nevegals is rolling resistence.  The Toros roll so much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a set of Toro&#8217;s cheap on ebay and have ridden them for a couple of weeks.  I live in Carson City, NV, so I ride dry rocky/sandy conditions.  The tire is definitely not 2.1.  It looks more like a 1.95 especially compared to my Nevegals.  I have these mounted on DT 470 rims, set up tubeless.  So far, I am happy with the grip and control even for the narrow profile.  They hold air beautifully.  The biggest difference compared to my Nevegals is rolling resistence.  The Toros roll so much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/#comment-59788</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2243#comment-59788</guid>
		<description>Gshock: 690 grams :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gshock: 690 grams <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gshock</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/#comment-59787</link>
		<dc:creator>Gshock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2243#comment-59787</guid>
		<description>Did you get a chance to weigh the Toro?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you get a chance to weigh the Toro?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/#comment-58555</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2243#comment-58555</guid>
		<description>Mike: I have not seen anything hydro in a lower end Shimano brake. Only mech discs. The Avid Juicy 3 stuff is on sale pretty cheap at a lot of on-line retailers sites, and I have used those with good results.

Quad brakes are available through LBS retailers that deal with J&amp;B Importers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I have not seen anything hydro in a lower end Shimano brake. Only mech discs. The Avid Juicy 3 stuff is on sale pretty cheap at a lot of on-line retailers sites, and I have used those with good results.</p>
<p>Quad brakes are available through LBS retailers that deal with J&amp;B Importers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/03/08/hutchinson-toro-29%e2%80%b3er-tubeless-ready-tire-first-impressions/#comment-58552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2243#comment-58552</guid>
		<description>Well, my brakes are actually the Shimano M485’s, which I believe are a little below regular Deore level hydraulic brakes, so they probably wouldn’t perform as well as Deore XT brakes (and would probably be quite a bit heavier). I’m not sure that I could afford Deore XT hydraulic brakes.  
You haven&#039;t had any experience with or heard anything about the Shimano’s M485’s or Deore level hydraulics are?
Where did you get your Quad Dime XC brakes?
Thanks,
Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my brakes are actually the Shimano M485’s, which I believe are a little below regular Deore level hydraulic brakes, so they probably wouldn’t perform as well as Deore XT brakes (and would probably be quite a bit heavier). I’m not sure that I could afford Deore XT hydraulic brakes.<br />
You haven&#8217;t had any experience with or heard anything about the Shimano’s M485’s or Deore level hydraulics are?<br />
Where did you get your Quad Dime XC brakes?<br />
Thanks,<br />
Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

