<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Giant XTC 29&#8243;er: Sneak Peek!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: pilotpapakilo</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/#comment-59817</link>
		<dc:creator>pilotpapakilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2188#comment-59817</guid>
		<description>I just got my XTC 29 1 today and absolutely love it!!!!  Great Bike!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got my XTC 29 1 today and absolutely love it!!!!  Great Bike!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: am_dude</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/#comment-58636</link>
		<dc:creator>am_dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2188#comment-58636</guid>
		<description>I typically ride mostly technial AM, vs XC trails.  I&#039;ve ridden several 29&#039;ers in the last year and like them, but do not think any of the current 29ers perform any better than the AM 26&#039;ers. 

I ride a Giant reign with Fox 36 fork w 20QR -- so I have found that most of the 29ers are not stiff enough in the front. 

I would jump at the opp to buy a 29er with a stiffer front, and another 1 inch of travel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typically ride mostly technial AM, vs XC trails.  I&#8217;ve ridden several 29&#8242;ers in the last year and like them, but do not think any of the current 29ers perform any better than the AM 26&#8242;ers. </p>
<p>I ride a Giant reign with Fox 36 fork w 20QR &#8212; so I have found that most of the 29ers are not stiff enough in the front. </p>
<p>I would jump at the opp to buy a 29er with a stiffer front, and another 1 inch of travel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: large and fit</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/#comment-58489</link>
		<dc:creator>large and fit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2188#comment-58489</guid>
		<description>I think I remember Marz sending out an industry wide memo stating that they would never make a tapered steer fork...not too long ago

good thinkg we have all these new 29er frames poping up to push technology along...

keep the new frames and products coming; big company or small

nice work GTed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I remember Marz sending out an industry wide memo stating that they would never make a tapered steer fork&#8230;not too long ago</p>
<p>good thinkg we have all these new 29er frames poping up to push technology along&#8230;</p>
<p>keep the new frames and products coming; big company or small</p>
<p>nice work GTed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirt McGirt</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/#comment-58483</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirt McGirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2188#comment-58483</guid>
		<description>Maximumradness-

Here here. Kids bikes make the best jumpers... and they&#039;re cheap cuz you go through them so quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maximumradness-</p>
<p>Here here. Kids bikes make the best jumpers&#8230; and they&#8217;re cheap cuz you go through them so quick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2009/02/27/giant-xtc-29er-sneak-peek/#comment-58466</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=2188#comment-58466</guid>
		<description>jimmythefly: Thanks for that information. I thought perhaps somebody had already done the tapered seer tube on a hardtail, but I wasn&#039;t sure. :)

As to your comments on stiffness/steering precision, I think the tapered steer tube will absolutely make a difference. Keeping in mind that the 29&quot;er, by nature of it&#039;s design, means longer top and down tubes which are generally mated to a short head tube to reduce front end height. All these things conspire to make for a twisty front end on many 29&quot;ers. This, of course, gives you a vague steering feel and can cause big problems in handling through technical terrain. 

The tapered steer tube does a couple of things. First, it makes for a stiffer steer tube which will help with lever forces at the crown/steer tube junction- right where the taper is its largest. The taper will also dissapate energy in a better way as well. Secondly, the bigger diameter at the down tube/ head tube junction means larger cross section tubing can be utilised with a bigger weld surface area. This makes the front end stronger. Also, that bigger down tube resists twisting better, so the front end will feel more prescise. 

I really do not see any downside for 29&quot;er freaks and I suspect that in five years the straight steer tube may be extinct. I do know that by 2010 all major fork manufacturers will have tapered steer tube 29&quot;er forks in their lines. I think in conjunction with the through axle fork, the tapered steer tube fork will make 29&quot;ers handle far more precisely than we are accustomed to now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jimmythefly: Thanks for that information. I thought perhaps somebody had already done the tapered seer tube on a hardtail, but I wasn&#8217;t sure. <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As to your comments on stiffness/steering precision, I think the tapered steer tube will absolutely make a difference. Keeping in mind that the 29&#8243;er, by nature of it&#8217;s design, means longer top and down tubes which are generally mated to a short head tube to reduce front end height. All these things conspire to make for a twisty front end on many 29&#8243;ers. This, of course, gives you a vague steering feel and can cause big problems in handling through technical terrain. </p>
<p>The tapered steer tube does a couple of things. First, it makes for a stiffer steer tube which will help with lever forces at the crown/steer tube junction- right where the taper is its largest. The taper will also dissapate energy in a better way as well. Secondly, the bigger diameter at the down tube/ head tube junction means larger cross section tubing can be utilised with a bigger weld surface area. This makes the front end stronger. Also, that bigger down tube resists twisting better, so the front end will feel more prescise. </p>
<p>I really do not see any downside for 29&#8243;er freaks and I suspect that in five years the straight steer tube may be extinct. I do know that by 2010 all major fork manufacturers will have tapered steer tube 29&#8243;er forks in their lines. I think in conjunction with the through axle fork, the tapered steer tube fork will make 29&#8243;ers handle far more precisely than we are accustomed to now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

