<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milwaukee Bicycle Company 29&#8243;er: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Illnacord</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/#comment-54077</link>
		<dc:creator>Illnacord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1569#comment-54077</guid>
		<description>Thanks GT for the replies. I may have even read those articles earlier before owning a 29er but like most things in life, you have to live through the mistakes/experiences to understand. Thank you again for updating. I def. agree with the 31.8 seatpost size - it also just looks better to have a fat seatpost than a thin one ;-) Aesthetics are more than half the battle when it comes to bikes for me. Otherwise, its put two wheels on a frame and ride back to basics. Anyways, I am now thinking of selling my XXIX Fox F29d large rig in parts and building up a 700cc interwolf&#039;d 38mm with a flat top tube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks GT for the replies. I may have even read those articles earlier before owning a 29er but like most things in life, you have to live through the mistakes/experiences to understand. Thank you again for updating. I def. agree with the 31.8 seatpost size &#8211; it also just looks better to have a fat seatpost than a thin one <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Aesthetics are more than half the battle when it comes to bikes for me. Otherwise, its put two wheels on a frame and ride back to basics. Anyways, I am now thinking of selling my XXIX Fox F29d large rig in parts and building up a 700cc interwolf&#8217;d 38mm with a flat top tube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/#comment-53974</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1569#comment-53974</guid>
		<description>Desert9r: Side to side as opposed to vertical flex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desert9r: Side to side as opposed to vertical flex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert9r</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/#comment-53971</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert9r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1569#comment-53971</guid>
		<description>GT- I first read this just after riding my Inbred 26er, :)
by lateral stiffness, what do you mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT- I first read this just after riding my Inbred 26er, <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
by lateral stiffness, what do you mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/#comment-53937</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1569#comment-53937</guid>
		<description>Desert9r: How does it compare to the Inbred?:  A great question! The Inbred is a very nice riding steel frame, but not as plush feeling as the MBC rig. I feel that the Inbred was also laterally stiffer, so if that is a major concern, then the Inbred might prove to be a better choice. Otherwise, I would choose the MBC based purely on the ride quality/smoothness.  I would choose the Inbred for racing primarily. It is a racier rig. 

Prices: Everything is going up in price, so that said, I can not effectively make a judgement on value until everything settles out. I would say that for a U.S.A. welded, True Temper tubed frame, $1050 isn&#039;t sounding all that bad. 

Weight: I haven&#039;t weighed the bike, but it feels within ounces of my Inbred and that had a carbon rigid fork, while this has a Manitou Minute. I would say it must be reasonably lightweight, but I will weigh it and post up the findings in my next post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desert9r: How does it compare to the Inbred?:  A great question! The Inbred is a very nice riding steel frame, but not as plush feeling as the MBC rig. I feel that the Inbred was also laterally stiffer, so if that is a major concern, then the Inbred might prove to be a better choice. Otherwise, I would choose the MBC based purely on the ride quality/smoothness.  I would choose the Inbred for racing primarily. It is a racier rig. </p>
<p>Prices: Everything is going up in price, so that said, I can not effectively make a judgement on value until everything settles out. I would say that for a U.S.A. welded, True Temper tubed frame, $1050 isn&#8217;t sounding all that bad. </p>
<p>Weight: I haven&#8217;t weighed the bike, but it feels within ounces of my Inbred and that had a carbon rigid fork, while this has a Manitou Minute. I would say it must be reasonably lightweight, but I will weigh it and post up the findings in my next post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert9r</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/16/milwaukee-bicycle-company-29er-first-impressions/#comment-53917</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert9r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1569#comment-53917</guid>
		<description>GT-

I know that you said this is a comfortable rig, how does it compare to the Inbred? are the prices proportionate to the comfort? does high-end steel take off much weight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GT-</p>
<p>I know that you said this is a comfortable rig, how does it compare to the Inbred? are the prices proportionate to the comfort? does high-end steel take off much weight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

