<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spinner 2Nine Suspension Fork: Final Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/13/spinner-2nine-suspension-fork-final-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/13/spinner-2nine-suspension-fork-final-review/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:18:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: agu</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/13/spinner-2nine-suspension-fork-final-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53704</link>
		<dc:creator>agu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1562#comment-53704</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to see the upcoming versions of these affordable forks...aside from Rob Y&#039;s suggestions, maybe they can jazz up the graphics a bit? If their next versions (Spinner and RST) can approach the performance of a &quot;classic&quot; Reba 29er - at least in the dampening and tuning departments and not necessarily incorporating platform or MoCo technology, that&#039;d be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see the upcoming versions of these affordable forks&#8230;aside from Rob Y&#8217;s suggestions, maybe they can jazz up the graphics a bit? If their next versions (Spinner and RST) can approach the performance of a &#8220;classic&#8221; Reba 29er &#8211; at least in the dampening and tuning departments and not necessarily incorporating platform or MoCo technology, that&#8217;d be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Y from Ottawa</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/11/13/spinner-2nine-suspension-fork-final-review/comment-page-1/#comment-53634</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Y from Ottawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=1562#comment-53634</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review Guitar Ted!  :)  

My 2 cents..

I agree, going to 32mm stanchions would be great.  Going disc only is not a good idea in my opinion.  V&#039;s are fine, especially on a fork like this.  Cleaner look my a**, it would be nice it there were more V brake capable 29er suspension forks on the market, not less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review Guitar Ted!  <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>My 2 cents..</p>
<p>I agree, going to 32mm stanchions would be great.  Going disc only is not a good idea in my opinion.  V&#8217;s are fine, especially on a fork like this.  Cleaner look my a**, it would be nice it there were more V brake capable 29er suspension forks on the market, not less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
