<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Time To Lay The Triple Crank To Rest?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: bubba</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40986</link>
		<dc:creator>bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40986</guid>
		<description>This is what I meant:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2008/tech/probikes/index.php?id=/photos/2008/tech/probikes/sam_schultz_gary_fisher_superfly08/sam_schultz_superfly_crankset

How are you guys keeping the chain on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what I meant:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2008/tech/probikes/index.php?id=/photos/2008/tech/probikes/sam_schultz_gary_fisher_superfly08/sam_schultz_superfly_crankset" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyclingnews.com/photos/2008/tech/probikes/index.php?id=/photos/2008/tech/probikes/sam_schultz_gary_fisher_superfly08/sam_schultz_superfly_crankset</a></p>
<p>How are you guys keeping the chain on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirt McGirt</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40857</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirt McGirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40857</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. This is a lot of jibba jabba for something that&#039;s personal preference.......

Cubicle jobs anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. This is a lot of jibba jabba for something that&#8217;s personal preference&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cubicle jobs anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Menzo</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40826</link>
		<dc:creator>Menzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40826</guid>
		<description>Indeed they could add a 36 and 38 teeth in the back and ditch one chainring in the front. But I think it would be less painful to stick with 9 speed and offer more chainrings options in the front. Most companies offer only the 22-32-44 for years now although many people (me included) would like to ride other combinations like a 20-30-40 or 22-29-42, or anything else according to their preferences. I can choose the number of teeth I want to build a cassette now I want to choose the number of teeth I want to buid a crankset...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed they could add a 36 and 38 teeth in the back and ditch one chainring in the front. But I think it would be less painful to stick with 9 speed and offer more chainrings options in the front. Most companies offer only the 22-32-44 for years now although many people (me included) would like to ride other combinations like a 20-30-40 or 22-29-42, or anything else according to their preferences. I can choose the number of teeth I want to build a cassette now I want to choose the number of teeth I want to buid a crankset&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R squared</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40825</link>
		<dc:creator>R squared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40825</guid>
		<description>I have not had 3 rings on my mountain bike for 10 years... It all started with my Cannondale F3000SL which was stocked 2 by 9, it came geared with a 29 - 39. I started using a 26 - 36 up front on my first 29er, and have trimmed it down to just using one 32 or a 34 front ring depending on  how much up hill their is. The chain never drops and never sucks.

I may consider going back to 2 rings if they came out with an affordable 2 by 9 crank that was light and would allow me to run something in the range of a 30 - 40. But for now, the single ring is lighter, less problematic, and easier to use.

Adam Craig has been rocking a single ring at world cups this year, and many other pros have been running only 2 rings for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not had 3 rings on my mountain bike for 10 years&#8230; It all started with my Cannondale F3000SL which was stocked 2 by 9, it came geared with a 29 &#8211; 39. I started using a 26 &#8211; 36 up front on my first 29er, and have trimmed it down to just using one 32 or a 34 front ring depending on  how much up hill their is. The chain never drops and never sucks.</p>
<p>I may consider going back to 2 rings if they came out with an affordable 2 by 9 crank that was light and would allow me to run something in the range of a 30 &#8211; 40. But for now, the single ring is lighter, less problematic, and easier to use.</p>
<p>Adam Craig has been rocking a single ring at world cups this year, and many other pros have been running only 2 rings for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40786</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2008/06/19/is-it-time-to-lay-the-triple-crank-to-rest/#comment-40786</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been running a 2x9 for years on all my MTBs. 22-32-bash. I need the extra ground clearance a lot more than I need the extra few gears...my bashguard has big chunks out of it, and if it were a big ring it would have been destroyed long ago.  

Then again, it&#039;s mountainous around here, so I&#039;m either grinding slowly up a hill or coasting down it. If there were a lot of flat, swoopy, buff trails in my area I&#039;d probably think otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running a 2&#215;9 for years on all my MTBs. 22-32-bash. I need the extra ground clearance a lot more than I need the extra few gears&#8230;my bashguard has big chunks out of it, and if it were a big ring it would have been destroyed long ago.  </p>
<p>Then again, it&#8217;s mountainous around here, so I&#8217;m either grinding slowly up a hill or coasting down it. If there were a lot of flat, swoopy, buff trails in my area I&#8217;d probably think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

