<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Wheel Evolution?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Krpan</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23433</link>
		<dc:creator>George Krpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 02:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23433</guid>
		<description>Retro-grouches make me grouchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retro-grouches make me grouchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23228</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23228</guid>
		<description>King will just do what they always do : launch a standard of their own, suiting their convenience. They did it with the Perdido intergrated headset, and will do it againn now with 1 1/4" headsets, which they did offer for some time after Fisher had been pushing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King will just do what they always do : launch a standard of their own, suiting their convenience. They did it with the Perdido intergrated headset, and will do it againn now with 1 1/4&#8243; headsets, which they did offer for some time after Fisher had been pushing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23196</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23196</guid>
		<description>BearSquirrel: My example is the new Yeti carbon AS-R bike that uses a standard Shimano outboard bearing, but it's inside the BB shell. My bet is that soon we will see a "Madone" approach, (which is closely related to what Cannondale does with their SI bottom brackets) and the cup will altogether be eliminated. Another example is Crank Brothers new headsets which are nothing more than bearing races and bearings with no "cup" in the traditional sense. 

Of course, all this "new" stuff is really old. The direct placement of bearings on the frame is a trick used by old racing bikes from the 30's and 40's, which usually did this with head set bearings. 

Vandal: I'd be surprised if Chris King went the way of the dodo bird, because not everyone is going to buy into the "new" ways. Of course there will always be lots of custom builders and old frames about that will be needing traditional headsets too. Think about how many OE King headsets there are. Not many! King does most of their business aftermarket, and I suspect that will always be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BearSquirrel: My example is the new Yeti carbon AS-R bike that uses a standard Shimano outboard bearing, but it&#8217;s inside the BB shell. My bet is that soon we will see a &#8220;Madone&#8221; approach, (which is closely related to what Cannondale does with their SI bottom brackets) and the cup will altogether be eliminated. Another example is Crank Brothers new headsets which are nothing more than bearing races and bearings with no &#8220;cup&#8221; in the traditional sense. </p>
<p>Of course, all this &#8220;new&#8221; stuff is really old. The direct placement of bearings on the frame is a trick used by old racing bikes from the 30&#8217;s and 40&#8217;s, which usually did this with head set bearings. </p>
<p>Vandal: I&#8217;d be surprised if Chris King went the way of the dodo bird, because not everyone is going to buy into the &#8220;new&#8221; ways. Of course there will always be lots of custom builders and old frames about that will be needing traditional headsets too. Think about how many OE King headsets there are. Not many! King does most of their business aftermarket, and I suspect that will always be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vandal</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23178</link>
		<dc:creator>Vandal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23178</guid>
		<description>Examples of the steerer tube changes and integrated bb bearings can be seen on the Trek Madone.
The lower headtube cup is 1.5" while the top is the standard 1.125".  This addresses the stress riser created at the junction of the fork crown/steerer tube.
The Madone also captures what would be the external bb cups in the carbon bb shell.  The carbon is now molded to act as the seat for the cartrige bearings rather than having a metal cup for that purpose.  The crank bolt pulls everything snug and play-free.

In the case of the head tube, plenty of mtb manufacturers have started a trend towards integrated headsets.  Does this spell the end for Chris King?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Examples of the steerer tube changes and integrated bb bearings can be seen on the Trek Madone.<br />
The lower headtube cup is 1.5&#8243; while the top is the standard 1.125&#8243;.  This addresses the stress riser created at the junction of the fork crown/steerer tube.<br />
The Madone also captures what would be the external bb cups in the carbon bb shell.  The carbon is now molded to act as the seat for the cartrige bearings rather than having a metal cup for that purpose.  The crank bolt pulls everything snug and play-free.</p>
<p>In the case of the head tube, plenty of mtb manufacturers have started a trend towards integrated headsets.  Does this spell the end for Chris King?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMcG</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23171</link>
		<dc:creator>MMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23171</guid>
		<description>I think the new Pivot Cycles (Chris Cocalis and Dave Weagle) mountain bikes witll have this type of "inboard" bearing bottom bracket set up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new Pivot Cycles (Chris Cocalis and Dave Weagle) mountain bikes witll have this type of &#8220;inboard&#8221; bearing bottom bracket set up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martini</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23167</link>
		<dc:creator>martini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23167</guid>
		<description>Take a look see at what Wolfhound cycles has done for one example. Browsing through Eurobike photos I also saw this application on road bikes. Smart move in my mind. Should prove to be a much stiffer interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look see at what Wolfhound cycles has done for one example. Browsing through Eurobike photos I also saw this application on road bikes. Smart move in my mind. Should prove to be a much stiffer interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BearSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23160</link>
		<dc:creator>BearSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23160</guid>
		<description>What is an example of inboard bearing bottom bracket shells?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is an example of inboard bearing bottom bracket shells?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23155</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/17/big-wheel-evolution/#comment-23155</guid>
		<description>I know for a fact that one key manufacturer is looking into that head tube thing, and has been for at least over a year. Patience, but it WILL happen that way in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know for a fact that one key manufacturer is looking into that head tube thing, and has been for at least over a year. Patience, but it WILL happen that way in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
