<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak Peek: Continental&#8217;s New 29&#8243;er Tire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:07:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jmat</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-33002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-33002</guid>
		<description>I just mounted up a 2.4 on the front on my Rig - there is no way this is a 2.4 - expect a 2.1 - 2.2.  Tire looks great and I&#039;ll let you know how it feels and performs on a rigid 29er..


Paid 39.99 at LBS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just mounted up a 2.4 on the front on my Rig &#8211; there is no way this is a 2.4 &#8211; expect a 2.1 &#8211; 2.2.  Tire looks great and I&#8217;ll let you know how it feels and performs on a rigid 29er..</p>
<p>Paid 39.99 at LBS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunnspeed</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-23001</link>
		<dc:creator>wunnspeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 14:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-23001</guid>
		<description>Ah... the old U.S. market only BS! Charming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; the old U.S. market only BS! Charming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-22978</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-22978</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d call the Vapors I&#039;ve seen rather 1.8&quot;. The 1.9 Kenda Karma is sooooo much bigger than the Vapor. Nice Monstercross tire though, it seems about as offroadable as a Ritchey Z-Max 1.7. Okay, a bit more. I used to like the Z-MAx, but they also gave me a record of pinch flats.

Now a Dutch Conti rep once told me they are a brand of allround tires. No specialists. And they seem to be true to that. The Explorer is universally loved by those that hate tire changes. The Twister Supersonic are loved by weight weenie racers, for nearly all conditions. Those mountain king might be a flashier, faster, better mud shedding allround-knobby than the explorer.

I wish they&#039;d give us Twisters and Speedkings though. Way too often I see folkks on Twisters having a better tire choice than others, even in &quot;different&quot; conditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d call the Vapors I&#8217;ve seen rather 1.8&#8243;. The 1.9 Kenda Karma is sooooo much bigger than the Vapor. Nice Monstercross tire though, it seems about as offroadable as a Ritchey Z-Max 1.7. Okay, a bit more. I used to like the Z-MAx, but they also gave me a record of pinch flats.</p>
<p>Now a Dutch Conti rep once told me they are a brand of allround tires. No specialists. And they seem to be true to that. The Explorer is universally loved by those that hate tire changes. The Twister Supersonic are loved by weight weenie racers, for nearly all conditions. Those mountain king might be a flashier, faster, better mud shedding allround-knobby than the explorer.</p>
<p>I wish they&#8217;d give us Twisters and Speedkings though. Way too often I see folkks on Twisters having a better tire choice than others, even in &#8220;different&#8221; conditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-22965</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-22965</guid>
		<description>Desert9r: Yeah, you can still pick up the Vapor, if you don&#039;t mind a 1.95 inch 29&quot;er tire.

Cloxxki: My source told me today that the Mountain King has pretty soft sidewalls and has &quot;mad traction&quot; in softer conditions. I wonder about the Mud Queen myself. It&#039;s going to have to be really good to be better than a Michelin XC AT. I think those are the best mud shedders yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Desert9r: Yeah, you can still pick up the Vapor, if you don&#8217;t mind a 1.95 inch 29&#8243;er tire.</p>
<p>Cloxxki: My source told me today that the Mountain King has pretty soft sidewalls and has &#8220;mad traction&#8221; in softer conditions. I wonder about the Mud Queen myself. It&#8217;s going to have to be really good to be better than a Michelin XC AT. I think those are the best mud shedders yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desert9r</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-22964</link>
		<dc:creator>Desert9r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-22964</guid>
		<description>Those Look cool! Is Conti still making the Vapor? I have wanted to try them for a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Look cool! Is Conti still making the Vapor? I have wanted to try them for a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/comment-page-1/#comment-22956</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/09/14/sneak-peek-continentals-new-29er-tire/#comment-22956</guid>
		<description>Cool!
At Eurobike I never got ahold of the one guy who was supposed to know about the tires NOT in the catalogue, likely for the US market only. 
A buddy rode the 26&quot; Speed Kings (2.1 then or so)  in a recent mud-infested race, and said they cleared fine. A Mud Queen...should be something then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!<br />
At Eurobike I never got ahold of the one guy who was supposed to know about the tires NOT in the catalogue, likely for the US market only.<br />
A buddy rode the 26&#8243; Speed Kings (2.1 then or so)  in a recent mud-infested race, and said they cleared fine. A Mud Queen&#8230;should be something then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
