<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trek&#8217;s 69er: First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:07:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: name:este</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-13954</link>
		<dc:creator>name:este</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/#comment-13954</guid>
		<description>Nice legs, they even match your shorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice legs, they even match your shorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-13949</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/#comment-13949</guid>
		<description>For those reading this that are curious, look for a few enlightening comments from Brendan Collier, his wife Mary, and Heather Irminger cocerning the 69er platform, women in mountain biking, and racing. Good stuff that will be posted up in a few days from now, with all luck. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those reading this that are curious, look for a few enlightening comments from Brendan Collier, his wife Mary, and Heather Irminger cocerning the 69er platform, women in mountain biking, and racing. Good stuff that will be posted up in a few days from now, with all luck. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: name:este</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-13895</link>
		<dc:creator>name:este</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 22:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/#comment-13895</guid>
		<description>69ers are hardly a new idea. The 29&quot; Nano mould was hardly cooled off before they were being tried out because it was the only way to retro a 29&quot; wheel on to the current crop of bikes at the time. I know I tried it 7 years ago and it felt like a turd compared to a bike with the same size wheels, 26 or 29. But that is just my experience and others obviously vary. At the end of the day it is a bike, not much unlike any other in that it has two wheels, a frame, some brakes, a drivetrain a seat and handlebars. If Trek thinks it has potential I am for sure not going to tell them not to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>69ers are hardly a new idea. The 29&#8243; Nano mould was hardly cooled off before they were being tried out because it was the only way to retro a 29&#8243; wheel on to the current crop of bikes at the time. I know I tried it 7 years ago and it felt like a turd compared to a bike with the same size wheels, 26 or 29. But that is just my experience and others obviously vary. At the end of the day it is a bike, not much unlike any other in that it has two wheels, a frame, some brakes, a drivetrain a seat and handlebars. If Trek thinks it has potential I am for sure not going to tell them not to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trev</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-13894</link>
		<dc:creator>trev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/#comment-13894</guid>
		<description>why do you always give this concept the sh*ts! not every one likes 29ers, not everyone likes this idea, but give it a rest, your getting boring now. i like 96ers, but im getting another 29er, i know it wont accelerate as quick as the 96er but it will have some other benefits of a bigger wheel, just like it will have some negatives compared to a small wheel, but no doubt im gonna enjoy riding BOTH of them.  everyone knows you love 29ers, please stop slagging any new ideas off...............its starting to get annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do you always give this concept the sh*ts! not every one likes 29ers, not everyone likes this idea, but give it a rest, your getting boring now. i like 96ers, but im getting another 29er, i know it wont accelerate as quick as the 96er but it will have some other benefits of a bigger wheel, just like it will have some negatives compared to a small wheel, but no doubt im gonna enjoy riding BOTH of them.  everyone knows you love 29ers, please stop slagging any new ideas off&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;its starting to get annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/04/12/treks-69er-first-impressions/#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>So, what IS the idea with the smaller rear wheel?
Trek is doing a whole line-up of these bikes, WHY?

So, they sold fifty+ 69ers. How many would that have been in 29&quot;? Twelve? Twelve hundred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what IS the idea with the smaller rear wheel?<br />
Trek is doing a whole line-up of these bikes, WHY?</p>
<p>So, they sold fifty+ 69ers. How many would that have been in 29&#8243;? Twelve? Twelve hundred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
