<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trek 29&#8243;ers Soon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: name:este</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9857</link>
		<dc:creator>name:este</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9857</guid>
		<description>Maybe you need to just adjust the title here: Source of latest Trek 29" rumours last seen streaking dance floor at Texas Red Neck Reggae Concert.......

At this point Trek has to enter the fray. Any company that doesn't will have egg on its face at Interbike 2007 and be wearing omelets by 2008. All the hype is now blowing in the wind for the most part but also on Cycling News there was an update on the 26 vs 29 testing I saw. BFD. Too late for the buzzer there. I don't think that anyone should really care at this point if one is better than the other because they both just are, and always have been. Bikes that is. Run what you brung. You say tomato and I say tomatoe etc. 

Originally I thought it would take 5 years for 29"ers to assimilate in to the industry, now it looks like it will be more like 9 or 10. But in retrospect it doesn't surprise me at all. Nor will it when I see a Motiv 29"er on the Wal Mart sales floor someday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you need to just adjust the title here: Source of latest Trek 29&#8243; rumours last seen streaking dance floor at Texas Red Neck Reggae Concert&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>At this point Trek has to enter the fray. Any company that doesn&#8217;t will have egg on its face at Interbike 2007 and be wearing omelets by 2008. All the hype is now blowing in the wind for the most part but also on Cycling News there was an update on the 26 vs 29 testing I saw. BFD. Too late for the buzzer there. I don&#8217;t think that anyone should really care at this point if one is better than the other because they both just are, and always have been. Bikes that is. Run what you brung. You say tomato and I say tomatoe etc. </p>
<p>Originally I thought it would take 5 years for 29&#8243;ers to assimilate in to the industry, now it looks like it will be more like 9 or 10. But in retrospect it doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all. Nor will it when I see a Motiv 29&#8243;er on the Wal Mart sales floor someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9770</guid>
		<description>name:este: Yeah, it's hard to say from that angle, but if I had to put money on it, I'd say you were right. My inside Trek guy says he'd be surprised if it wasn't a 69"er and that he's seen "several around here". However; the "guy that has a problem losing stuff" swears it was a 29"er and not only that, that Travis also had a 29"er hardtail there with him. 

That last picture.......I coulda done without that! Better lay offa the Stranahan's there mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>name:este: Yeah, it&#8217;s hard to say from that angle, but if I had to put money on it, I&#8217;d say you were right. My inside Trek guy says he&#8217;d be surprised if it wasn&#8217;t a 69&#8243;er and that he&#8217;s seen &#8220;several around here&#8221;. However; the &#8220;guy that has a problem losing stuff&#8221; swears it was a 29&#8243;er and not only that, that Travis also had a 29&#8243;er hardtail there with him. </p>
<p>That last picture&#8230;&#8230;.I coulda done without that! Better lay offa the Stranahan&#8217;s there mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: name:este</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9766</link>
		<dc:creator>name:este</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9766</guid>
		<description>http://www.cyclingnews.com/mtbphotos.php?id=/photos/2007/feb07/masomenos/13DSCN5659

Not saying that T Rek is not coming out with a 29"er and I could care less if they do, but Travis's bike in Tejas sure looks alot like a 69er to me......

Also check out the last photo in that section.....that guy has a problem losing stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cyclingnews.com/mtbphotos.php?id=/photos/2007/feb07/masomenos/13DSCN5659" rel="nofollow">http://www.cyclingnews.com/mtbphotos.php?id=/photos/2007/feb07/masomenos/13DSCN5659</a></p>
<p>Not saying that T Rek is not coming out with a 29&#8243;er and I could care less if they do, but Travis&#8217;s bike in Tejas sure looks alot like a 69er to me&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Also check out the last photo in that section&#8230;..that guy has a problem losing stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Nine Inches &#124; A 29er Bike site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lots o&#8217; Links</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9713</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Nine Inches &#124; A 29er Bike site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lots o&#8217; Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9713</guid>
		<description>[...] And the rumors continue with inside sources coughing up the goods from the big boys in Waterloo. Trek is sick of seeing their sister company spank them in sales, so they&#8217;re gonna release their own 29er. Also, lots of new stuff coming out of Gary Fisher. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And the rumors continue with inside sources coughing up the goods from the big boys in Waterloo. Trek is sick of seeing their sister company spank them in sales, so they&#8217;re gonna release their own 29er. Also, lots of new stuff coming out of Gary Fisher. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rottenmac</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>rottenmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9686</guid>
		<description>A Fuel-based 29'er? Almost makes me want to buy a Trek.

...almost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Fuel-based 29&#8242;er? Almost makes me want to buy a Trek.</p>
<p>&#8230;almost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twenty Nine Inches &#124; A 29er Bike site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Trek/Gary Fisher Rumors</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Twenty Nine Inches &#124; A 29er Bike site &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Trek/Gary Fisher Rumors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2007/02/19/trek-29ers-soon/#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>[...] In addition to the earlier post, I&#8217;m hearing more about Trek 29&#8243;ers coming out this fall. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition to the earlier post, I&#8217;m hearing more about Trek 29&#8243;ers coming out this fall. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
