<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying out the Raleigh XXIX 29er</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max S</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-15356</link>
		<dc:creator>Max S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 02:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-15356</guid>
		<description>Had the chance to ride one today and it was smooth and really agile, think I am going to get one in a few days. One question though, how is it on the trails?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the chance to ride one today and it was smooth and really agile, think I am going to get one in a few days. One question though, how is it on the trails?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt H</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-13408</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-13408</guid>
		<description>I cant wait to get mine. Any updates on the ride of this machine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant wait to get mine. Any updates on the ride of this machine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spoketurner</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>spoketurner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 20:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>I've had mine on order for 3 weeks can't wait to get it.  The pictures are great, thanks for the look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had mine on order for 3 weeks can&#8217;t wait to get it.  The pictures are great, thanks for the look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>Here is a response I got via e-mail from our Raleigh rep concerning my questions about the fork and geometry of the XXIX. The e-mail was sent originally sent from the product engineer to the rep and forwarded to me. Here it follows in it's entirety. Some interesting numbers!



Hi Bill,

The actual fork being used is a 40mm offset. The information that got printed was a typo. And that stuff happens.

The actual axle to crown height is 430mm. Not quite suspension height but not too low either. And we kept it this way to keep it as a true single speed and not have look abnormal. And like Mark pointed out…it does allow for more people to fit the bike. And that is why the seat tube actuals are shorter than normal. It’s to compensate for the larger tires. We didn’t want it to be too high with the bigger wheels and with a suspension fork with sag; the geometry is not much different. This is how our completely built samples, with and with out suspension, have measured out. Please note this is with an 80mm travel Reba compensated with 20mm of sag.

 

Rigid                70degree HA                 315mm BB height

Suspension       69.5 degree HA             328mm BB height

 

And we are in the works with a geared version using an 80mm travel Reba.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a response I got via e-mail from our Raleigh rep concerning my questions about the fork and geometry of the XXIX. The e-mail was sent originally sent from the product engineer to the rep and forwarded to me. Here it follows in it&#8217;s entirety. Some interesting numbers!</p>
<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>The actual fork being used is a 40mm offset. The information that got printed was a typo. And that stuff happens.</p>
<p>The actual axle to crown height is 430mm. Not quite suspension height but not too low either. And we kept it this way to keep it as a true single speed and not have look abnormal. And like Mark pointed out…it does allow for more people to fit the bike. And that is why the seat tube actuals are shorter than normal. It’s to compensate for the larger tires. We didn’t want it to be too high with the bigger wheels and with a suspension fork with sag; the geometry is not much different. This is how our completely built samples, with and with out suspension, have measured out. Please note this is with an 80mm travel Reba compensated with 20mm of sag.</p>
<p>Rigid                70degree HA                 315mm BB height</p>
<p>Suspension       69.5 degree HA             328mm BB height</p>
<p>And we are in the works with a geared version using an 80mm travel Reba.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jncarpenter</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-2044</link>
		<dc:creator>jncarpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 04:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-2044</guid>
		<description>I had the chance to take a spin around the parking lot yesterday on this bike....it is a very smooth feeling ride. A very nice little package from Raleigh, regardless of the niche target market....I am sorely tempted to pick one up ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the chance to take a spin around the parking lot yesterday on this bike&#8230;.it is a very smooth feeling ride. A very nice little package from Raleigh, regardless of the niche target market&#8230;.I am sorely tempted to pick one up ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MMcG</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>MMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>Have you put more miles on it?  How does it handle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you put more miles on it?  How does it handle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spanky</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>spanky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 02:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>When will these be available? It looks like a great everyday ride. I bet the fork is like the Sibex fork in that it''s a suspention corrected 26" fork without canti studs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will these be available? It looks like a great everyday ride. I bet the fork is like the Sibex fork in that it&#8217;&#8217;s a suspention corrected 26&#8243; fork without canti studs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-1990</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-1990</guid>
		<description>The fork is not corrected for suspension, you are correct, Joe. I was as surprised by this as you. It is a daring move on the part of Raleigh, but I think it makes sense in a couple of ways.

One: Most single speed 29"er guys tend to run their rigs with a rigid fork anyway. A recent poll on mtbr.com on the 29"er Forum bears this out.

Two: It has the simple, elegant, and sleek look of a bicycle in it's most basic and classiest form, sans the disc brakes. If this were a fixed gear bike, it would be the purest production off road machine ever produced on a mass scale. As it stands, you can say it's a "retro-grouch", backwards step, or a sensible machine. Take your pick. 

I like it. It's definetely not the run of the mill 29"er single speed bike that we have so many choices in right now. (Could you imagine saying THAT three years ago?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fork is not corrected for suspension, you are correct, Joe. I was as surprised by this as you. It is a daring move on the part of Raleigh, but I think it makes sense in a couple of ways.</p>
<p>One: Most single speed 29&#8243;er guys tend to run their rigs with a rigid fork anyway. A recent poll on mtbr.com on the 29&#8243;er Forum bears this out.</p>
<p>Two: It has the simple, elegant, and sleek look of a bicycle in it&#8217;s most basic and classiest form, sans the disc brakes. If this were a fixed gear bike, it would be the purest production off road machine ever produced on a mass scale. As it stands, you can say it&#8217;s a &#8220;retro-grouch&#8221;, backwards step, or a sensible machine. Take your pick. </p>
<p>I like it. It&#8217;s definetely not the run of the mill 29&#8243;er single speed bike that we have so many choices in right now. (Could you imagine saying THAT three years ago?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-1989</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-1989</guid>
		<description>All the photos of this bike make it look as if the fork is not suspension corrected.  Is this true?  What is the Axle to Crown measurement on this fork?  If it isn't suspension corrected, I am really surprised by Raleigh for not making it so.  I can see custom builders out there building non-sus corrected for their custy's, but not OEM manufacturer's like Raleigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the photos of this bike make it look as if the fork is not suspension corrected.  Is this true?  What is the Axle to Crown measurement on this fork?  If it isn&#8217;t suspension corrected, I am really surprised by Raleigh for not making it so.  I can see custom builders out there building non-sus corrected for their custy&#8217;s, but not OEM manufacturer&#8217;s like Raleigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/06/06/trying-out-the-raleigh-xxix-29er/#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 10:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/?p=232#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>Wow! That's sweet, Tim.

No shocks. No pegs..............Lucky!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That&#8217;s sweet, Tim.</p>
<p>No shocks. No pegs&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Lucky!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
