<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prototype #3 of Intense Spider 29er</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/</link>
	<description>29er Bike Reviews, Rumors and News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bigjay</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-19104</link>
		<dc:creator>bigjay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-19104</guid>
		<description>My surly karate monkey has a 72 degree HA and handles well.  The Spider has a 73 degree with the 80mm travel fork and a 72 with a 100mm fork.  if you want to slack it out a bit more, thenjust run a 120mm and it'll feel more trailbike oriented.

Its actually a more versatile design than most as setting up a 120 or more travel fork on slacker HA designs will make the front end feel very sluggish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My surly karate monkey has a 72 degree HA and handles well.  The Spider has a 73 degree with the 80mm travel fork and a 72 with a 100mm fork.  if you want to slack it out a bit more, thenjust run a 120mm and it&#8217;ll feel more trailbike oriented.</p>
<p>Its actually a more versatile design than most as setting up a 120 or more travel fork on slacker HA designs will make the front end feel very sluggish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: -kw</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>-kw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Here are &lt;a href="http://mtbomaha.blogspot.com/2006/02/intense-cycles-spider-29.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;some comments from a couple weeks back&lt;/a&gt; off of &lt;a href="http://www.mtbomaha.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;MTB Omaha&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are <a href="http://mtbomaha.blogspot.com/2006/02/intense-cycles-spider-29.html" rel="nofollow">some comments from a couple weeks back</a> off of <a href="http://www.mtbomaha.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">MTB Omaha</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 18:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Hmm........."no dogs or obvious operator errors"? Seems almost....well, magical.  One thing is for sure, you shouldn't consider an Intense 29"er VPP. But, there are several other folks quite excited by the prospect. As they say, "Your mileage may vary".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;no dogs or obvious operator errors&#8221;? Seems almost&#8230;.well, magical.  One thing is for sure, you shouldn&#8217;t consider an Intense 29&#8243;er VPP. But, there are several other folks quite excited by the prospect. As they say, &#8220;Your mileage may vary&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catflopsy</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>catflopsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 17:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-316</guid>
		<description>5000 plus mile of single track and fire roads on a large 29er fisher hard tail and a Large 292. OTB only once due to over reacting to being charged by three dogs and hitting the front skids hard. Got a medium 292 with 100mm Reba and went OTB three times in three hundred miles on the same trails. There were no dogs or obvious opperartor errors. The Medium fisher 292 has a simular top tube length as the Intense and a slacker HA of 71.5. A medium with a 73 degree HT seems even more dangerous than the Fisher and the large would be a little large for a 5'10" rider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5000 plus mile of single track and fire roads on a large 29er fisher hard tail and a Large 292. OTB only once due to over reacting to being charged by three dogs and hitting the front skids hard. Got a medium 292 with 100mm Reba and went OTB three times in three hundred miles on the same trails. There were no dogs or obvious opperartor errors. The Medium fisher 292 has a simular top tube length as the Intense and a slacker HA of 71.5. A medium with a 73 degree HT seems even more dangerous than the Fisher and the large would be a little large for a 5&#8242;10&#8243; rider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guitar Ted</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Guitar Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>catflopsy: Have you ridden any 29"ers with a 73 degree head angle? 72 degree? If not, you might be surprised to know that alot of 29"ers use a 72 degree head angle to achieve a similar trail figure as that of a 26" bike. This is due to the larger diameter wheel. The 29"er also has less tendency to throw you OTB because the rider sits a little more below the axles than one does on a 26"er. 

The Intense is only going one degree steeper, and test riders have all raved about the handling, to a man. Yes, 73 degrees sounds steep from a 26 inch stand point, but 29"ers require a whole different geometry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catflopsy: Have you ridden any 29&#8243;ers with a 73 degree head angle? 72 degree? If not, you might be surprised to know that alot of 29&#8243;ers use a 72 degree head angle to achieve a similar trail figure as that of a 26&#8243; bike. This is due to the larger diameter wheel. The 29&#8243;er also has less tendency to throw you OTB because the rider sits a little more below the axles than one does on a 26&#8243;er. </p>
<p>The Intense is only going one degree steeper, and test riders have all raved about the handling, to a man. Yes, 73 degrees sounds steep from a 26 inch stand point, but 29&#8243;ers require a whole different geometry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catflopsy</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>catflopsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-311</guid>
		<description>High potential for going over the bars in steep rough descents. Not a question of if but when will this bike with it's 73 degree HA sends me OTB. I was seriously considering waiting to purchase the Intense frame since my LBS has ordered two of them but I have purchased an Asterix Monk 29er instead with a 70.5 HA for the safety factor. Monk frame is probably at least a pound heavier but the safer the bike is the faster I dare to ride. Hopefuly Intense will reconsider the geometry a bit befor full production.I am no expert but my experience is that a 73 degree HA on a trail bike is dangerous. Are there factors that I am not considering which make this bike safer than it appears to be? By comparison, Blur LT (26 inch) has a 69.5 degree HA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High potential for going over the bars in steep rough descents. Not a question of if but when will this bike with it&#8217;s 73 degree HA sends me OTB. I was seriously considering waiting to purchase the Intense frame since my LBS has ordered two of them but I have purchased an Asterix Monk 29er instead with a 70.5 HA for the safety factor. Monk frame is probably at least a pound heavier but the safer the bike is the faster I dare to ride. Hopefuly Intense will reconsider the geometry a bit befor full production.I am no expert but my experience is that a 73 degree HA on a trail bike is dangerous. Are there factors that I am not considering which make this bike safer than it appears to be? By comparison, Blur LT (26 inch) has a 69.5 degree HA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 08:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>It looks like the stem is flipped over too giving it that Cannondale look. Some of the other pics show a normal stem install and the head angle does not look as steep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the stem is flipped over too giving it that Cannondale look. Some of the other pics show a normal stem install and the head angle does not look as steep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloxxki</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloxxki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>The pic is a bit deceiving, front wheel is lower than the rear in it, angles look more extreme.
Not sure how 25% of rear sag slackens angles by 2 degrees. I wonder whether that HA is with sag accounted for too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pic is a bit deceiving, front wheel is lower than the rear in it, angles look more extreme.<br />
Not sure how 25% of rear sag slackens angles by 2 degrees. I wonder whether that HA is with sag accounted for too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekoostick</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>ekoostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>...And why does it have last years Reba?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;And why does it have last years Reba?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekoostick</title>
		<link>http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>ekoostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentynineinches.com/2006/03/07/prototype-3-of-intense-spider-29er/#comment-289</guid>
		<description>That head angle is mighty extreme. Looks like they ran it into a wall. I have a 71 degree on my 80mm corrected Wojcik and I thought that was agressive. The Intense is intense looking though. Should be a fun bike if they ever fix the rear pivot :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That head angle is mighty extreme. Looks like they ran it into a wall. I have a 71 degree on my 80mm corrected Wojcik and I thought that was agressive. The Intense is intense looking though. Should be a fun bike if they ever fix the rear pivot <img src='http://twentynineinches.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
